Answer and Explanation:
I will go through each and every option explaining the reasons and what option would be the best:
The (a) part says 'difference in wages will eventually disappear since a haircut is a homogeneous good' - This is not true because even though it is an homogeneous product, some customers do have a strong preference for barbers who are not going bald. Therefore, they know their worth and they would want to capitalize on that and get paid just a bit more than bald barbers.
The (b) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will be able to charge a higher price for a haircut to those consumers who have a strong preference for barbers with hair'. - If the barbershop charges higher price for barbers that have hair then the customers will prefer bald barbers as the questions mentions that there is high competition and since it is an homogeneous, customers would be willing to save money and get their haircut from some other barber.
The (c) part says 'barbershops that hire bald barbers will always be much more profitable' - Not necessarily. The reason is that some customers have a strong preference for barbers who are not bald and therefore, that would help barbershops who have barbers with hair to be a bit more profitable as some additional customers would want their services.
The (d) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will always be much more profitable' - This is the best option and the reason for it is because some customers have a strong preference for barbers with hair and that would help the barbershop to earn more. They would have the customers who already indifferent to whoever cuts their hair and in addition to that, they would also have the customers who have their preference.
Hence the answer is D.
The perception of Jensen to blame the management regarding the unavailability of resources is a representation of defensive bias.
<h3>What is bias?</h3>
A bias is a partial psychological orientation, which represents favor towards a particular thing or condition.
When someone does want to blame himself for not being able to complete the tasks being assigned, such a person will represent a defensive bias, so that he diverts the blame from himself.
Hence, the defensive bias of Jensen is represented in the situation as aforementioned.
Learn more about bias here:
brainly.com/question/1236875
#SPJ1
Employee Benefit refers to the division of a company's profits among its workers.
Employee perks, also known as fringe benefits, perquisites, or perks, refer to various forms of non-wage remuneration given to employees in addition to their regular earnings or salaries. Employee perks, particularly in British English, also refer to rewards in kind.
Salary packaging or salary exchange arrangements are situations where an employee trades in (cash) compensation for another type of perk. The majority of employee benefits are at least partially taxable in most nations. Housing (provided by the employer or paid for by the employer), furnished or not, with or without utilities free, group insurance (health, dental, life, etc.), disability income protection, retirement benefits, daycare, tuition reimbursement, sick leave, and paid vacation are some examples of these benefits.
Learn more about Employee Benefit here.
brainly.com/question/28163981
#SPJ1
She would be most likely to file under SINGLE :)
Hope this helps
Answer:
The correct answer is: neither the first nor the second would promote growth.
Explanation:
A country with a relatively low level of real GDP per person is considering adopting two policies to promote economic growth.The first is to increase barriers to trade.The second is to restrict foreign portfolio investment.Which of these policies would most economist think would promote growth
One of the main statistical indicators used to measure the economic evolution of a country is the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In the macroeconomic analysis of any State, the interpretation of this value is essential to know the degree of economic development and its trends.
The weak growth of productivity in many advanced and emerging market economies after the international financial crisis is raising concerns about growth prospects. A new study indicates that reducing barriers to international trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) could stimulate productivity and output.
The entry of portfolio investment into the country is associated with the yield and risk differentials of the country abroad. This means that a change in the perception of country risk is not necessary. Rather, they need to change in relation to existing alternatives in other countries. Therefore, significant movements in this area do not necessarily reflect a change in the state of the country's economy, however, they can have important repercussions on the exchange rate and other fundamental variables of the financial markets.
