Which of the following is consistent with the law of supply:
1. The price of a good falls and its supply decreases.
2.The price of a good rises and its quantity supplied decreases.
3.The price of a good rises and its supply increases.
4.The price of a good rises and its quantity supplied increases.
As the price of a product goes down, the quantity supplied goes up. As the price of a product goes up, the quantity supplied goes down. As the price of a product goes down, the quantity supplied goes down. As the price of a product goes up, the quantity supplied stays the same.
<em>The south gained by the strengthening of the fugitive slave law, the north gained a new free state, California. Texas lost territory but was compensated with 10 million dollars to pay for its debt. Slave trade was prohibited in Washington DC, but slavery was not.</em>
Taxes, Higher Prices, Pay gov./ city officials, etc. but if there are answer choices i could help better
The answer is, To argue for, there's the obvious, which is that the colonists didn't
like their lack of voice within British Parliament. They also didn't
like how Britain was treating other colonies, what would become Canada
for instance, with similar laws and codes seen in the US colonies. You
could also argue that it was a more financial decision, as the taxes
placed upon the colonies and the restrictions on trade were hurting
American businesses. Honestly, an argument combining the two would
probably be more rounded.
Answer:
In the early 16th century, the Treaty between Spain and Portugal, concluded at Vitoria; February 19, 1524 and called for the Badajoz Junta to meet in 1524, at which the two countries tried to reach an agreement on the anti-meridian but failed.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
