OK The topic I chose was on if Children should have social media. I said no and here are my reasons why:
*There can be inappropriate content
*People can send you friend requests that are scams
*There are many intriguing ads which contain viruses
*Some things on the sites are really scary or have adult humor
*There can be large amounts of obscenities such as swear words
Children can be too young to understand some things that have to do with the internet like these scams, and some may be too young to understand the some words are meant to be refrained from. (That can be your thesis, and use your propaganda skills to assemble these ideas into an essay that really shows social media is not for everyone. Also remember to include the age you think should be allowed to use it.
Answer: Well, To improve the relationship between the ideas expounded by Bernie Sanders, the writer must: option B, add "However" to the beginning of sentence 2, in this case, the paragraph would be as follows: Bernie Sanders argues that no one should have to pay the tuition to go to university. However, this will only increase the tax burden on the middle classes.In this order of ideas, it is inferred from the text that the author considers that nobody should pay tuition to go to university, but he knows that if this is approved, the tax burden on the middle classes would be increased. Most people know that the tax burden is the taxes that the government charges especially to the middle and upper classes to settle or balance the investments that the government itself makes in favour of the people such as the subsidy for study or housing.
<em>hope this helped :) p.s mind giving brainliest?</em>
Answer: i could be wrong but im pretty sure its A state involving beliefs and feelings that causes a person to think or act in a certain way.
In psychology, attitude is a psychological construct, a mental and emotional entity that inheres in, or characterizes a person. They are complex and are an acquired state through experiences.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Without having read the article, I would say the answer has to be D. Weisel didn't waste our time, nor pander to our prejudice. He reminds us how awful things were in the 1940s.
