Answer:
Deciding whether a territory would allow slavery or not based on a vote of the people in the territories led to slavery supporters and abolitionists both rushing to the region in order to vote on the issue. This led to an outbreak of violence between the settlers.
Explanation:
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was enacted by Congress in 1854. It granted popular sovereignty to the people in the Kansas and Nebraska territories, letting them decide whether they'd allow slavery. In essence, this made the Kansas-Nebraska act a repeal of the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had said there would be no slavery north of latitude 36°30´ except for Missouri.
After the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed into Kansas to try to sway the outcome of the issue, and violence between the two sides occurred. The term "bleeding Kansas" was used because of the bloodshed.
I think it would be the treaty of Paris in 1763?
Chronological thinking is the foundation of historical reasoning—the ability to examine relationships among historical events and to explain historical causality
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation
The Tories were those American colonists who remained loyal subjects of Great Britain and who were against separation during the American Revolutionary War.
Moreover, they were ofthen called Royalists or Loyalists and they were against the Patriots who supported the separation.
The truth about U.S productivity in WWII was that:
- US factories produced aircraft for the war effort.
- US troops at the front relied on trucks to keep them supplied.
<h3>How was U.S. military production in WWII?</h3>
There are no images attached but historically speaking, the above are true.
The Americans engaged in the production of airplanes, tanks, and other military equipment that supplied the allies.
American soldiers would often receive supplies in the front through the use of trucks which would drive to them.
Find out more on American WWII production at brainly.com/question/19433412.
#SPJ1
