What was a cotton gin and what effect did it have on slavery in the south?

History

2 answers:

Sonja [21]3 years ago

6 0

It decreased the number of slaves making items out of cotton but never decreased how many were in the fields

Dima020 [189]3 years ago

5 0

The cotton gin was created to help speed up production of cotton. They made it easy to pick the cotton away from its branches ( i guess thats what you call it) and was able to do it faster and in large quantities, which was hoped to be used to end slavery. However, slavery was increased, for then southerners could be able to grow more cotton for more profit. In fact, slave population increased.

hope this helps

You might be interested in

I need help please and thanks Which best describes the Little Rock 9

ki77a [65]

Answer:

I would go with the third one if im not wrong.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

During the economic boom after World War II, what did advertisers do to get consumers to buy new

Scilla [17]

Answer:

Ads.

Explanation:

Ads used by the advertisers to get attention of the consumers to buy new products because the ads attract the consumers by providing information to the consumers. In these ads, benefits of the product is mentioned so for that benefits people used the products that is seen in the ads so ads is the only way to attract consumers towards the new products and make profit from them.

6 0

3 years ago

2. Anong pangyayari ang naging hudyat ng himagsikan ng mga Pilipino laban sa Espanyol?

gogolik [260]

Answer:

D. Unang Sigaw Sa Pugad Lawin

5 0

3 years ago

Does anyone know the answer to this please be honest

kiruha [24]

Answer:

Should be A

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Did the foreign policy actions of the United States reflect selfish, imperialist ambitions or did the USA act as a concerned "bi

nikitadnepr [17]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although you did not specify the time in history or any specific context, we are going to assume that you are referring to the US imperialistic role through history.

Being that the case, we can comment on the following.

The foreign policy actions of the United States reflect selfish, imperialist ambitions since the times of President James Polk and the Manifested Destiny. He expanded the US territory acquiring the Mexican northern states after the Mexican-American War.

Since those years, passing through the times of President Monroe and the Monroe Doctrine and President Theodore Roosevelt and his Roosevelt corollary, the United States has always had interventionist purposes as part of its foreign agenda.

Nobody has granted the US the right or role to be the "big brother" who was looking after the interests of the western hemisphere. That is why the US has had many problems throughout history in the Middle East, Latin America, Europe, and other regions.

3 0

3 years ago