Too much power in central government America had just experienced the rule of a tyrannical leader. They were afraid that if they gave the central government too much power, then they would end up going through the same problems again. So they ended up giving too much power to the states, and too little to the central government. Later on they had to change the rule because nothing was working out well. They owed other countries money and they figured that something had to change. Hope I helped please mark as brainliest :)
Political trends regarding the level of government involvement in social issues are reflected by the success of conservative or liberal perspectives in political parties, in the sense of favoring greater or lesser government involvement in social issues.
The liberal perspective favors greater government regulation in the marketplace and less government involvement in personal privacy issues. Liberalism is only in favor of government intervention of private property rights and freedom.
On the other hand, from the conservative perspective, there is a favoring of lesser government protectionism in the market, private property and trade.
Regarding social issues, the conservative ideology favors the government to be less involved in decisions so that greater social and economic equality is achieved.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/2261035
Answer: A) The English colonies traded more than the French colonies.
B) The British colonies had a larger population than the French colonies.
C) The French colonies farmed more than the British colonies.
E) The British colonies were more spread out across North America than the French colonies.
Explanation:
Answer: Which kingdom broke free from Mali, created an Islamic empire, and then conquered Mali? answer choices. Songhai. Ghana. Egypt.
Answer:
Explanation:
Métis are people of mixed European and Indigenous ancestry, and one of the three recognized Aboriginal peoples in Canada. The use of the term Métis is complex and contentious and has different historical and contemporary meanings. The term is used to describe communities of mixed European and Indigenous descent across Canada, and a specific community of people — defined as the Métis Nation — which originated largely in Western Canada and emerged as a political force in the 19th century, radiating outwards from the Red River Settlement. While the Canadian government politically marginalized the Métis after 1885, they have since been recognized as Aboriginal people with rights enshrined in the Constitution of Canada and more clearly defined in a series of Supreme Court of Canada decisions.
The use of the terms “Métis” and “métis” is complex and contentious. When capitalized, the term often describes people of the Métis Nation, who trace their origins to the Red River Valley and the prairies beyond. The Métis National Council (MNC), the political organization that represents the Métis Nation, defined “Metis” in 2002 as: “a person who self-identifies as Métis, is distinct from other Aboriginal Peoples, is of historic Métis Nation ancestry and who is accepted by the Métis Nation.”
