The US, Canada, and Mexico all participate in the USMCA so the answer is B
Answer:
This is an opinion!
Explanation:
Okay, so we all know the Articals of Confederation were too weak and it made the government crumble. Shay's Rebellion is what proved this. So it's obvious the government needs to change, but should you keep the Articals?? That is your opinion.
If completely scrap:
"Hello, my fellow delegates. We all know the Articals of Confederation is not the best work. We can't fund the army, states are going against each other, and the people are all rather poor. There is no way we can fix this without starting over! There is no way we can stand by this without our government crumbling. We all worked so hard to have life liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, but we can only have that if our government is stronger."
If just revise:
"Hello, my fellow delegates. We all know the Articals of Confederation is not our best work, but we can't just scrap it completely! We only need to edit it. It has it's pros, like declaring war! We can't have too strong of a government, or else all we fought for would be for nothing! The Articals were thoughtfully written out, and just scrapping it would be a complete waste."
Either one is fine, you can use whichever! Try rewriting it in your own words, and be creative. Hope this helps! :))
Answer: Compensate for the risk
Explanation:
The compensate risk is one of the type of risk control that helps in illustrating the given example of squad as they wants to cross the bridge so the leader of the squad are concern about the various types of associate risk and the hazards regarding the problem.
The compensate risk is one of the concept that helps in typically adjusting with the given situation and risk and managing the given situation effectively. As, the platoon commander directing all the instruction to the squad so they effectively manage given problem.
Therefore, Compensate for the risk is the correct answer.
Speaker 1: The will of the people is what is best for society.
Speaker 2: People exchange some of their individual freedoms for protection by the government.
Speaker 3: Governments should be divided into branches that are <span>separate but equal.
</span>Speaker 4: Governments derive their powers from the consent of the <span>people.
The </span><span>Baron de Montesquieu would most likely agree with the Speaker 3, as it was Montesquieu who theorize first that a government should be divided into branches that are separated but equal (the three branches should be executive, legislative and judiciary), in order to avoid that one of the three could acquire more power than the other and as a form of control of democracy.</span>
