Answer:
The date the United States entered the war = On April 6, 1917
The date of Treaty of Versailles = 28 June 1919
Explanation:
USA started fighting for it allies ( Britain, France, and Russia ) on April 6, 1917.
Over 2 million USA soldiers fought on the battle fields. US citizens were not in favour of entering the war. The date of the Treaty of Versailles is 28 June 1919 and it is the most important of the peace treaties that brought World War I to an end.
Answer:
A simplified alphabet made it easier for people to participate in decisions that shaped their communities.
Explanation:
The news of the failure of the French armies in Belgium gave rise in Paris to popular movements on March 9–10, 1793; and on March 10, on the proposal of Georges Danton<span>, the Convention decreed that there should be established in Paris an extraordinary criminal tribunal, which received the official name of the Revolutionary Tribunal by a decree of Oct. 29, 1793.</span>
He swore that he will get Germany out of the Great Depression that they were having at the time. He also swore that he will get vengeance to the U.S., Britain, Japan etc... since they seized land, military and almost everything away from the Germans.
We can say that a person is biased when their opinion or recollection of something favors one <u>person, idea, or group</u> more so than the other. It is the inability to remain impartial.
Though it cannot be denied that the statement that was given by Lum May as to the events of November 3rd, 1885 may be biased, I do not believe his account of the occurrence is overly biased. He describes the violent nature of the altercation, the burning down of Chinese homes, and the trauma that overtook the sanity of his wife.
All of these statements made by Lum May are backed by evidence such as:
- The piles of ashes where Chinese homes once stood
- A similar recollection of the events from hundreds of Chinese citizens who were present
- The unstable nature of his wife's mental health.
All of this leads us to believe that Lum May is a credible source for the events of <em>November 3rd, 1885 </em>in Tacoma.
Unlike the credible testimony of Lum May, we can infer that the letter from James Wickersham is not only extremely biased in nature, but also an overwhelmingly unreliable source of information. Many of the participants of that day were indicted for their actions, giving Mr. Wickersham much to lose were he to provide accurate information.
The evidence supporting the statements of Lum May allows us to infer that her recollection of the events is credible and not overly swayed by bias. However, the contradictory statements declared by James Wickersham and the repercussions he may face should he tell the truth, point towards his letter being an unreliable and overly biased source.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/25061293?referrer=searchResults