Answer:
Required Asset to increase sales by 16% is $480,000
Increased liability percentage is $64,000
Added to retained earnings $319,000
Explanation:
Funsters should increase the supply of its doll now before the other doll hits the market.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The success of any organisation depends on how well the company evaluates about its competitors and their plans. It must predict what the competitors will be doing in future and take actions accordingly so that that will not get affected by the move taken by their competitors. They must plan their productions accordingly so that there will not be any loss to them.
In the example given, the company Funsters, Inc sells its toys at $15. But it knows that the leading competitor decides to sell toys at Lower rate of $5 in next six weeks. Thus Funsters.Inc should increase the supply of its doll now before the other doll hits the market.
Answer:
Option (b) is correct.
Explanation:
In 2010,
Real GDP = 600,000
Population = 5,000
Real GDP per person:
= Real GDP ÷ Population
= 600,000 ÷ 5,000
= 120
In 2011,
Real GDP = 636,480
Population = 5,200
Real GDP per person:
= Real GDP ÷ Population
= 636,480 ÷ 5,200
= 122.4
Growth rate of real GDP per person during the year 2011:
= [(Real GDP per person in 2011 - Real GDP per person in 2010) ÷ Real GDP per person in 2010] × 100
= [(122.4 - 120) ÷ 120] × 100
= (2.4 ÷ 120) × 100
= 0.02 × 100
= 2%
It was seen from the data available on the world bank that the United states real GDP per person is growing at an average rate of 2% between 1910 and 2010.
Hence, the Growth rate of real GDP per person during the year 2011 is about the same as average U.S. growth over the last one-hundred years.
The statement above is FALSE.
The correct statement goes like this: Either a yardage chain that joins two rods exactly 10 yards apart or any other 10 yard indicator with a visible line to gain indicator shall be used as the official line to gain equipment.
This statement is found in the article 5, section 3 which talks about equipment in football game.<span />
Answer:
This would be considered permissible corporate political speech.
Explanation:
In Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court basically eliminated any limits on how much money corporations can spend in order to support or attack political candidates. Citizens United is a nonprofit organization that spent a lot of money supporting candidates, what we currently know as a Super PAC. Super PAC's do not have a limit on how much money they can collect and spend supporting candidates. As long as Blue Marbles doesn't coordinate their activities with any political candidate, they are allowed to support or attack anyone.