Options:
A.) has discharged its obligation to Brian.
B.) is liable for specific performance.
C.) will likely have to pay Brian damages if Brian decides to sue them.
D.) will not likely have to pay Brian damages if Brian decides to sue them.
Answer: C.) will likely have to pay Brian damages if Brian decides to sue them.
Explanation: According to the information presented in the scenario above, Lovely Landscapes are contracted to Brian and Soria and as such responsible for mowing the lawn of Brian's landscape. Lovely landscape's failure to show up or contact Brian and Soria explaining why they won't be able to fulfil their contract terms could be attached to a breach of contract which could involve Lovely Landscapes paying Brian and Soria damages for their no-show if Brian intends to pursue a case or sue Lovely landscapes.
Answer:
Bad debts expenses for the year $ 44,400
Explanation:
Computation of Bad debts expenses for the year
Estimated uncollectible accounts based on ageing of receivable $ 49,400
Pre adjustment credit balance-allowance for uncollectible account <u>$ 5,000</u>
Bad debts expenses for the year $ 44,400
Answer:
Current yield is 6.17%
<em>YTD is 5.43%</em>
<em>YTC is 4.26%</em>
Explanation:
Tenor: 15 years
-> number of payment (NPer) is 30 (= 15 years * 2 for semiannual)
Coupon rate: 7.4%
- > semiannual payments (PMT): $37 = ($1000*7.4%/2)
Future value (FV): $1000
Present value (PV): $1200
Current yield = annual coupon/ current price = $37*2/$1200 = 6.17%
<u>Extra: </u>
We use excel to calculate yield to date (YTD) or nominal yield:
= Rate(Nper, PMT, - PV,FV) = Rate(30,37,-1200,1000) = 2.717% semiannual
-> annual rate is 5.43%
The bond issue is callable in 5 years at a call price of $1,074, then FV is $1074
Yield to call = rate(10,37,-1200,1074) = 2.13% semiannual
-> annual rate is 4.26%
Answer: Marginal cost under demand and supply theory. Answer is 80
Explanation: QD 100-4P, Marginal Cost =S4,QS =6P -20. So
the calculation goes thus = QS=6p-20
Inputing Marginal value of 4 equates 100-4(4)
100-16 = 84
QS=6(4)-4
24-20=4
profit maximisation =QD-QS
84-4=80
Answer:
This proposal will not work.
Explanation:
All taxes work the same way, it doesn't matter if they are payroll taxes or taxes on goods or services. In this case, labor is the service provided by the employees (suppliers) and the employer is the consumer. A tax increase will reduce the demand for labor, and therefore the equilibrium price of labor (wage) will also decrease. If wages decreases, then workers are not going to be better off, on the contrary they will be worse off. This tax increase will lower both the wage and the employment level.
