Answer:
Japan, Germany, Great Britain, France, and Russia all acquired spheres of influence in China. ... It gave each nation rights to trade freely in each other's sphere of influence. At first, the other powers did not accept the policy.
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is D
Explanation:
Local governments are responsible for local issues, such as running the police and fire departments and maintaining public works, such as street cleaning, snow removal, and signage. Local governments take charge of public works projects because it would be too difficult for state governments and the federal government to run so many public works programs throughout the country.
Conquest, war, famine, and death
It is said in the bible in the last book called Revelations
Zealots were a political/philosophic movement in first century (what I call) Israel. They were (if I can put it this way) a sort of uncouth bunch who thought the only way to free themselves from Roman rule was to oppose the Romans with force.
That was their platform. They did not take into account that the Roman's were a huge military power that was ruthless when antagonized. As these things go, Rome was a pretty good ruler. At least they knew the difference between meaningful opposition and tolerance of differences.
The zealots did not see Rome that way. They believed that any interference was too much interference.
That's when Rome got upset and the first Jewish War of 65 AD or so began. It was like sticking your arm in a hornet's nest. The Zealots had gained the largely unwelcome wrath of Rome. The zealots were unlucky (in a way). If they had picked a time that a warrior/emperor was not leader, their opposition may have evaporated. It would be like hitting a marshmallow. Rome may have considered it an internal affair. They had up to this point. Even though some of the Pharisee priests supported the Zealots, the alliance was destroyed by the unwillingness to negotiate further.
Anyone who is really dedicated can be termed a Zealot in modern times. I am using the term to describe someone that is Zealous. You could look up Galatians 1:11 - 14 to see how Paul used the term. This connection between Paul and Jewish leaders (including Zealots) is really hotly debated. It's another hornet's nest.
Answer: it depends what you are talking about what documents are you trying to argue. But here is my shot in trying to help you make your argument clear that you are for the topic then use that information to write an argument against that topic.
Explanation: meaning if you are trying to argue let’s say the Indian removal act you would write why you are for it and then write why you are against it.
