N 1880, San Fransisco enacted an ordinance that required all laundry businesses had to be in buildings that were made of stone or brick. If they wanted to have a laundry that was in a wooden building, they needed to get permission from the board of supervisors. Due to challenges in other employment areas, Chinese immigrants often worked in or owned laundromats. In fact, 89% of San Fransisco's laundry businesses were operated by workers of Chinese descent.
The board of supervisors began granting whites permission to have laundry businesses in wooden buildings but didn't grant permission to Chinese immigrants. Those that violated this ordinance had to pay a fine. Yick Wo was an operator for 22 years in San Fransisco. He did not have a permit and refused to pay the fine. Wo was arrested and convicted. He then appealed his conviction, saying that the law was discriminating against him because of his race. The court ruled that he was still protected under the 14th Amendment and dismissed all charges. Looking at the background for this case and the ruling, the best answer choice would be that the court ruled that Chinese Americans were able to operate laundry facilities, just as native-born citizens could.
<span>Almoravids
After fourteen years of war with the fanatical Almoravids, Kumbi Saleh was captured and burned. The Almoravids were unable to sustain this victory for very long. Shortly after its capture, the weakened Ghanaians were able to retake it. The Mandika of Mali seized this opportunity to sever their ties with Ghanaian rule.</span>
Answer:
B. The advertisement mentions the company makes more than 32 million shoes a year.
Explanation:
This is the most logical explanation because the question asks "How does this 1923 advertisement respond directly to the rapid increase in demand for consumer goods during the 1920s?" and the advertisement tells them that 32 million pairs are made a year.
Answer:
with toleration of Huguenots.
Explanation:
The French Wars of Religion was a period of political turbulence and war between the Catholics and Huguenots (or Protestants). The ruler of France, Catherine de Médicis, consented to show tolerance for Huguenots, which was resented by powerful Catholic families. The war of religion took place between two factions, that is, the House of Bourbon and the House of Guise.
The House of Bourbon supported Protestanism and the House of Guise favoured Catholicism. Both the factions were supported by foreign resources.
The outcome of this prolonged Wars of Religion (1562–1598) came to rest with political unity with toleration of Huguenots. The war ended when the Edict of Nantes was issued which gave Catholicism the place of state religion of France and equal standing of Protestants with Catholics.
Therefore, the correct answer is that war ended with the toleration of Huguenots.
