Answer:
<em><u>Muslims</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>are</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>monotheistic</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>and</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>worship</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>one</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>all</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>knowing</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>god</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>whobin</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>arabic</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>is</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>known</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>as</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>allah</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Followers</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>of</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>islam</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>aim</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>to</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>live</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>life</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>of</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>complete</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>submissions</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>to</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>allah</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>they</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>belived</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>that</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>nothing</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>can</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>happen</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>without</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Allah</u></em><em><u>'</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>permission</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>but</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>humans</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>have</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>free</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>fall</u></em>
<span>In sentence construction, a sentence must naturally have a subject and a
predicate. IN the sentences above, the most logical sentence where the verb
agrees with the subject is letter B with the sentence: Every soup and salad
cost less than five dollars. The subject here is the ‘soup and salad’ while the
predicate is ‘cost less than five dollars’. In cases like the sentence A: My
friend and her mother laughs at all my jokes. ‘friend and mother’ were supposed
to be the subjects however, the verb agreed to another subject at the end of
the sentence which is ‘all my jokes’. </span>
Since the <em>Romantic </em>literature had set as its goal the "victory" or predominance of Man over Nature, its language tended to be somewhat triumphalistic (some would say hyperbolic) when it was about how human beings were deployed. Romanticism introduced an long-term project at a time when important scientific milestones were achieved, and also when most of modern nations and States were being founded, thus taking a voice which was very proud of national virtues, some of them legendary, part of folklore or popular culture (but belonging to a national heritage rather than coming from a more traditional stem). Neoclassicist literature was a new take on the Greek-Roman Classics, intending to bring them back into the mainstream and most of the times not fulfilling the feat. Based on this, Neoclassicist language could be felt as overblown. In a way, Romanticism was a look into the future (let us think of <em>Frankenstein </em>a very experimental novel for its time) whereas Neoclasicism very much represented a reaction to such future.
D it caused a rise of scurvy which occurs when not enough vitamins are taken
Hhhhhh hhhhh hhhh hhhh h hh h h h h h h