1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
saveliy_v [14]
3 years ago
12

Please help!

History
2 answers:
Anarel [89]3 years ago
8 0

The eastern part of the North American Continent was completely settled by the efforts that came from France, Spain, and England. Spaniards were able to manage an important part of what is now the country of Mexico, as well as the states of Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico. The French settled in what are now the states of Louisiana and Missouri. finally, the English were able to colonize the majority of the east coast, except for Florida which was initially controlled by the Spaniards.

The Western part of the Continent was not explored until the 19th century.

ira [324]3 years ago
4 0

was east and north

was not west

You might be interested in
Name a group that opposed the concept of Manifest Destiny? *
kotegsom [21]

Answer:

hope you like it

Explanation:

Manifest Destiny was the belief during the 1840s that American should stretch from the Atlantic to the Pacific ocean. ... It lead to the development of expansionists, those who supported to the idea of Manifest Destiny while whigs, stood firm against it.

Expansionists such as Roosevelt, former President Harrison, and Captain Mahan argued for creating an American empire. However, others, including Grover Cleveland, Andrew Carnegie, and Mark Twain, opposed these ideas. Manifest Destiny became a disputed philosophy.

8 0
3 years ago
How did assimilation within the Jewish community impact <br> anti-Semitism?
Anit [1.1K]

Answer:

In general the sociocultural process in which the sense and consciousness of association with one national and cultural group changes to identification with another such group, so that the merged individual or group may partially or totally lose its original national identity. Assimilation can occur and not only on the unconscious level in primitive societies. It has been shown that even these societies have sometimes developed specific mechanisms to facilitate assimilation, e.g., adoption; mobilization, and absorption into the tribal fighting force; exogamic marriage; the client relationship between the tribal protector and members of another tribe. In more developed societies, where a stronger sense of cultural and historical identification has evolved, the mechanisms, as well as the automatic media of assimilation, become more complicated. The reaction of the assimilator group to the penetration of the assimilated increasingly enters the picture.

Various factors may combine to advance or hinder the assimilation process. Those actively contributing include the position of economic strength held by a group; the political advantages to be gained from adhesion or separation; acknowledged cultural superiority; changes in religious outlook and customs; the disintegration of one group living within another more cohesive group; the development of an "open society" by either group. Added to these are external factors, such as changes in the demographic pattern (mainly migration) or those wrought by revolution and revolutionary attitudes. Sociologists have described the man in process of assimilation as "the marginal man," both attracted and repelled by the social and cultural spheres in which he lives in a state of transition.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
When it came to labor, management, and strikes, what are two precedents set by Roosevelt and the federal government? (more than
Vilka [71]
The best answers for this question would be:

<span>intervention in strikes affecting public welfare
and
the use of arbitration to settle labor disputes

Both answers describe how the government wants to be involved in order to conduct a peaceful conclusion. The methods are to have order with two types of people disagreeing, this is also to see what their point is. In conclusion, this is to listen to the people better and to understand opinion.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ASAP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

1. Congress was very weak and had no power to enforce any laws they passed.

2. It maintained the weak central government.

3. Confederate troops taking the Union’s Ft. Sumter in South Carolina.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain what feudalism was and what the roles of the lords and vassals were.
Vilka [71]

Answer:

Feudalism was the social system during medieval Europe. The roles of lords was to give their loyalty ad military assistance to the king. The role of the vassals was to give homage and military service to the lords. I hope this helps:))

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • To which level of government was the power of coining money, the army and navy, and making treaties given?
    14·1 answer
  • What did the colonists establish in order to make up for the fact that they were distanced
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following bestdescribes the Suez Crisis? 
    12·2 answers
  • What effect did the us war with Mexico have
    8·1 answer
  • Identify the cities in the modern United States of America that were established by the Spanish and are part of their colonial l
    11·1 answer
  • What is the difference between as satire and an ode?
    12·2 answers
  • Identify the key differences between the two territories the confederation set up to allow westward movement in both north and t
    6·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP PLEASE!!!!!<br> 10 POINTS!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • What happened to the economy of the New England region?
    11·1 answer
  • Why were translations of the bible into vernacular, or local, languages considered a threat to the catholic church?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!