1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Step2247 [10]
3 years ago
15

How were trusts and holding companies treated under the law?

History
2 answers:
sveticcg [70]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The Correct Answer is A

Explanation:

Anti-monopoly law

  • This law is mainly concerned with the fear of the concentration of market powers in the hands of few.
  • Misuse and harmful effects of some form of business cooperation of Monopoly power.
  • This act gave power to the federal government to Investigate trusts and companies suspected in violating this law.

stich3 [128]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A. trusts had no federal backing or insuring holding companies were also considered private lenders and holders so there was no federal back Lash therefore monopoly laws didnt apply.

You might be interested in
Read this passage from *Caribbean Climate Change."
Sonja [21]

Answer:

b. hurricanes and other powerful storms

Explanation:

if your in k12

6 0
3 years ago
What type of government does the United Kingdom have?
aksik [14]

Answer:

they have a queen instead of a president

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A blank is a person, especially the member of a group, who takes law into his own hands
disa [49]

Answer:

Vigilante.

Explanation:

Vigilante is a form of the word vigilant, which means "keeping a watchful or close eye on events and people." Sometimes a vigilante will make news for catching a criminal, and sometimes vigilante groups form to target crimes in a bad neighborhood. A common combined use is "vigilante justice," which refers to a form of law-keeping outside of the official channels of police and the courts.

Hope this helped! :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLZ HELP!! To renounce one’s liberty is to renounce one’s quality as a man, the rights and also the duties of humanity. For him
iren [92.7K]

Answer:

In this passage, Rousseau expresses his belief that when individuals renounce their liberty, they become enslaved by the government. He maintains that such a renunciation is incompatible with human nature, and that absolute government is vain and contradictory.  

This is the correct answer

7 0
3 years ago
I need help with 1b, 2a, 2b
dsp73
I'm sorry i can't help u I don't remember this topic

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which country became japan's colony after the russo-japanese war?
    8·1 answer
  • What’s is the answer to this ?
    13·2 answers
  • Give two reasons why americans moved west
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following best states what Theodore Roosevelt believed about U.S. foreign policy in the Americas?
    10·1 answer
  • Quien fue Jose Marti
    13·2 answers
  • How did the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 change the Missouri Compromise of 1820?
    6·1 answer
  • Which country declared war against Great Britain and then sent money and troops to aid
    10·1 answer
  • Does globalization promote or hinder human equality?
    10·2 answers
  • .. How did Europeans benefit from<br> the use of Africans as Slaves in<br> the Americas?
    12·1 answer
  • Which European country established a colony in the country of South Africa up until the 1930s?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!