Foreign investors provided an ensured ongoing domination of the Latin American economy. This caused Latin American countries to remain economically dependent on Western nations.
D is the answer please comment telling me if it was right
<span>Holmes dissented due to a belief that the opinion represented judicial activism, most specifically that it represented positions not held by the majority of the country. Moreover, he argued that the economic theory that was being used in the decision was not embodied in the Constitution.</span>
Explanation:
- The movement was essentially a peaceful and non-violent protest against the British government in India.
- Indians were asked to relinquish their titles and resign from nominated seats in the local bodies as a mark of protest.
- People were asked to resign from their government jobs.
- People were asked to withdraw their children from government-controlled or aided schools and colleges.
- People were asked to boycott foreign goods and use only Indian-made goods.
- People were asked to boycott the elections to the legislative councils.
- People were asked not to serve in the British army.
- It was also planned that if the above steps did not bring results, people would refuse to pay their taxes.
- The INC also demanded Swarajya or self-government.
- Only completely non-violent means would be employed to get the demands fulfilled.
- The non-cooperation movement was a decisive step in the independence movement because, for the first time, the INC was ready to forego constitutional means to achieve self-rule.
- Gandhiji had assured that Swaraj would be achieved in a year if this movement was continued to completion.
Hope this will help you..
Hey there,
The reason why Lincoln did this was to make sure that people would see that everyone is made equal weather the skin color is different or not.
~Jurgen
