1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GalinKa [24]
3 years ago
14

Who served first as Secretary of State, then as Supreme Court Justice?

History
1 answer:
mars1129 [50]3 years ago
3 0
He was Secretary of State under President John Adams<span> from 1800 to 1801. The longest-serving Chief Justice and the fourth longest-serving justice in U.S. Supreme Court history, Marshall dominated the Court for over three decades (34 years) and played a significant role in the development of the American legal system.</span>
You might be interested in
Zacchaeus was a:<br><br> poor man<br> rich man<br> Roman citizen<br> righteous man
Shkiper50 [21]

Answer:

rich man i think

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Unlike most Spanish and Portuguese traders in East Asia, most Dutch east India company traders did what
pishuonlain [190]

The Dutch East India Company was the first European that challenged the Portuguese domination of Asian trade. Different from Spanish and Portuguese traders, the Dutch expeditions were not controlled by the government, they had full sovereign powers. Because of that they had an enormous amount of power, they set up colonies and trading posts around the world, they captured Malacca from the Portuguese rule and opened trade with China.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Cyrus was best known for which of the following?
4vir4ik [10]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

because he is the killer of the kingdom

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did some progressives want to improve education? How did they work to fight corruption in local and state governments?
Lady_Fox [76]
<span>www.crf-usa.org/election-central/the-progressives.html</span>
4 0
3 years ago
How did passing law banning slavery in the northern states lead to a more divided nation?
Ghella [55]

I think this is because the Southern states were heavily reliant on slave labor because of the agricultural economy flourishing there and the South supported slavery while the North did not. The slaves provided cheap labor for the plantations in the South and they believed that their region's economy would be destroyed without slaves. The North had more urban cities which did not require much slave labor and had an overall moral opposition to slavery. With their opposing views and constant tension, the South eventually started to secede from the Union. Hope this helped!

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these statements best describes why it was difficult for many immigrants to find employment in the US in the late 1800s
    11·2 answers
  • How do you think Americans’ state of mind was influenced by the Red Scare
    11·1 answer
  • How did Milk know that his life was potentially in
    13·2 answers
  • How did Americans react to the British searches
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Which city became known as "New Rome" and served as the capital of the eastern Roman empire?
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes urban areas during the late 1800s?
    8·1 answer
  • how do federalism and the separation of powers limit the power of the national government? Answer in short essay question
    6·2 answers
  • Were the alliances formed between France, Russia and Britain against a common enemy – Germany.
    11·1 answer
  • Which issues were sources of economic problems facing farmers in the late 1920s?
    5·1 answer
  • Who was the richest banker in Italy?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!