Evaluate the extent to which the progressive era marked a turning point in the history of women in the United States

1 answer:

5 0

Even though Women did not get the right to vote until 1920. The progressive era started in the 1890's. It was mostly started by middle class to wealthy woman who sought to help the lower class woman. The helped improve working conditions for these woman by teaching them how to do collective bargaining with their employers. They also fought for the child labor laws. By helping the underclass and new immigrants the "suffragettes" showed the political and business men that were Women were not second class citizens and could be just as useful outside the home as in the home. This was a very powerful movement, which started small and gain women the right to vote.

You might be interested in

A belief of animism is that:

Stells [14]

Answer: innumerable spiritual beings concerned with human affairs and capable of helping or harming human interests.

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

intersecting domains of oppression that create a social space of domination and, by extension, a unique position within that spa

Dominik [7]

Answer:

It takes into account people's overlapping identities and experiences to understand the complexity of the prejudices they face.

In other words, the affirmative intersectional theory that people are often disadvantaged by multiple sources of oppression: their race, class, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, and other markers of identity. Intersectionality recognizes that identity markers (eg, "feminine" and "black") do not exist identified by each other, and each of the information to the others, often creating a complex convergence of oppression.

Explanation:

Today, intersectionality is considered crucial for social equity work. Activists and community organizations are asking for and participating in more dynamic conversations about differences in experience between people with different overlapping identities. Without an intersectional lens, events and movements that aim to address injustice toward one group can end up perpetuating systems of inequities towards other groups. Intersectionality fully informs YW Boston's work, by encouraging nuanced conversations about inequality in Boston. It illuminates us about health disparities among women of color, provides avenues for our youth leaders to understand identity, and is crucial to the advocacy work we support.

8 0

3 years ago

If intelligence is assumed to be normally distributed, which of the following would you expect to find in the overall population

Rasek [7]

Answer:

Intelligence an equally distributed phenomena:

Lets say that an overall population gets an equal share of intelligence to deal with things, then we must expect the term meritocratic system to follow up while the individuals who are analyzed in the field of education.

Explanation:

As, if the capacity of all the people inside a given population acquires an equal share of intelligence, irrespective of there race, ethnicity, and the language they speak then we would expect there analyses in a meritocratic system.
An illegitimate and unjustifiable educational inequalities will be there among the masses, as if the intelligence differentials at birth were made independent of the races and the languages the individuals speaks.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which is NOT a power of Congress?

valina [46]

d) veoting bills

only the resident can do this

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help Please: Why is it important to understand and fight horizontal oppression?

horrorfan [7]

Answer:

It's important to understand and fight horizontal oppression because:

A vulnerable group mustn't attack between himself, they must look for equal opportunities and a better life level, the reason why everyone must stop this type of oppression.

Explanation:

The horizontal oppression is the action where members from the same vulnerable group attack other members by reasons like different thoughts, conflicts of interests, or prejudices. How this behavior doesn't benefit the people in that group, in change, further affects them, the best action, in that case, is to stop immediately this action and make the aggressor see his mistake, an example can see where an afro-descendant harass another member of this population because be weak.

3 0

3 years ago