How much bigger is the senate compared to the house of rep

NEED HELP ASAP Wealthy Italian city that played an important role in the Renaissance

mixas84 [53]

I believe that’s city is Florence, Italy

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What affect did the XYZ affair have on America?

fiasKO [112]

The XYZ affair led to a period of anti-French sentiment in the United States, which was problematic as the French has been the key ally during the American revolution some 20 years before and was one of the primary reasons the United States was able to defeat Great Britain.

However, over those 20 years, France had undergone a revolution of their own and the United States decided to remain neutral in France's war against Great Britain.

6 0

3 years ago

From 1885 to 1887, the main problem facing western cattle barons were

lesya [120]

Droughts and severe winters were the main problems facing western cattle barons

6 0

2 years ago

What were allan bakke's arguments against the use of affirmative action? describe how the supreme court decided the bakke case.

zhannawk [14.2K]

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) was an important decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The case allowed the race to be one of the several important factors in college admission policy.

Allan P. Bakke, an engineer and former United States Marine Corps officer, sought admission to medical school, but was rejected for admission because of his age. Bakke was in his early 30s while applying and after twice being rejected by the University of California, Davis, he brought suit in state court. The California Supreme Court ordered Bakke admitted.

Supreme Court ruled specific racial quotas for minority students. Racial quota is a numerical requirement for the racial groups in education and employment while graduating, hiring or promoting.

4 0

3 years ago

Compare the federal government's role in the fight against communism with its role in the fight against racial discrimination. H

DedPeter [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

If we make a comparison between the federal government's role in the fight against communism with its role in the fight against racial discrimination, we find considerable differences.

During the Red Scare of the 1920s, the federal government of the United States was very concerned about the presence of anarchists and communists in the United States territory. That is why US President Woodrow Wilson ordered the Department of Justice to initiate the Palmer Raids to arrest communists and anarchists.

During the Second Red Scare in the times of Wisconsin Republican Senator Joseph McCartney, he accused the presence of communists in the interior of the US federal government and the military. The problem was that he accused but never presented valid evidence.

One way or the other the federal government was worried, concerned, and act in many different ways.

Regarding the fight against racial discrimination, the federal government has acted very differently. It seems that the government is not as interested as in the above-mentioned cases. It seems that it has not the same political interest as in the case of anarchism or communism. Truly, racism is not the first thing on the political agenda of the US.

How involved were citizens in these fights?

Citizens basically reacted with fear during the Red Sacre times. The government and mass media told them to be fearful of communist, and they were afraid. And they started to accuse people with no evidence at all.

Regarding the fight against racism, here it seems that some US citizens are more concerned about this issue and have actively participated in public demonstrations.

4 0

2 years ago