1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sveta [45]
3 years ago
14

What impact did Nat Turner’s rebellion have on the United States?

History
2 answers:
dsp733 years ago
8 0

The answer is:


" Slave revolts were the great societal fear in the South. Nat Turner’s was simply the largest and deadliest in the US. It’s impact was not on the war itself, per se, but on the culture of fear that predominated in the South, which lead to mistrust of Northern intents and purposes, and increased militarism, that lead to war being seen as a viable option and contributed to the early successes of the Confederacy on the battlefield.

This fear is of slave revolt was not new. The reason the Spartans created the agogi and trained as professional soldiers was because they conquered and enslaved the helots who were the majority population of Lakonia. The Spartans trained as soldiers because they lived in constant fear of being murdered in their beds by helot slaves.

Nat Turner’s rebellion also came within the living memory of the Haitian Revolution and massacre of the white French population that followed. These revolts and every subsequent slave revolt, increased the militancy and paranoia of white Southern society. Prior to the Civil War slave states funded their militias better, and drilled more vigorously and sent more sons to military schools than their free state counterparts. In fact, while only the Citadel and VMI remain as fully military schools, every Slave state had a state military college. LSU and the Texas A&M roots lie in these Military Colleges. Of the six “Senior Military Colleges” that still exist outside of the Service academies five are in former slave states.

The key to understanding the impact on the Civil War was that it wasn’t just slave-owners who feared slave revolts. It was non-slave owning white farmers as well. Turner’s revolt went from house to house freeing slaves if they found them and killing whites when they encountered them. Non-slave owners had just as much to fear as slave owners did. This is why the argument that the Civil War was not about slavery, because so many non slave owners fought, doesn’t hold true. Non-slave owning farmers enthusiastically joined the militias and posses to put down slave revolts when they occurred to protect their families.


Hope this helps!!

(Brainliest)

krek1111 [17]3 years ago
3 0

sale of slaves outside the south

You might be interested in
How did where women’s roles changing prior to the war?
AfilCa [17]

Answer:

World War II changed the lives of women and men in many ways. ... Most women labored in the clerical and service sectors where women had worked for decades, but the wartime economy created job opportunities for women in heavy industry and wartime production plants that had traditionally belonged to men.

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following regions of the world is the least industrialized
hoa [83]

Answer:

It is Central Africa.

Explanation:

It is Central Africa because it is very poor there and the leaders are too greedy to use money for creating factories and putting their own people to work.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Early American leaders designed the articles if Confederation to create a national government that.
alex41 [277]

After getting rid of the British,the leaders still thought it best to have a written document for the colonies to refer to.The articles of confederation was a weak version of the constitution.

If this isn't helpful I'm sorry its a little hard for me to explain

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
President obama appeared to be receptive to what type of federalism? what is it?
Dimas [21]
He believed in 2 things which might help you. I don't really know what term you are looking for, but here are the two things he brought to the table.

1. He was very concerned about states rights believing that the states should have the balance of power shifted to them.

2. He believed that domestic policy had to be addressed rather than war and terrorism which is what Bush emphasized.

He was accused of being more of a socialist than a federalist (which might even be true). You could call him a social democrat.
3 0
3 years ago
All of the following items qualify as primary sources except
kicyunya [14]
The answers d, advertisements
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was seen as a threat to American safety in the eastern areas?
    9·1 answer
  • If the people of Cerritos traded with the people of Mayapán, what goods might they exchange? How about the people of Copán and t
    11·1 answer
  • What advances did Mao Zedong's rule bring to China?
    9·2 answers
  • Which describes a change that occurred in Rome about 100 BC?
    12·2 answers
  • George Calvert Roger Williams William Penn What does Anne Hutchinson have in common with the people on this list? All founded a
    12·2 answers
  • describe life in the trenches. Be sure to include details and write from the perspective of a soldier fighting in the war.
    7·1 answer
  • How did the end of the cold war shift the international balance of power
    8·2 answers
  • King Leopold of Belgium established the colony of Congo Free State in order to gain access to
    8·1 answer
  • 1 way the akkadian and assyria empire are the same​
    10·1 answer
  • Elaborate How did authors of the 1920s use their writing to comment on American
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!