Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
Answer:
the present value is $88,087.08
Explanation:
The computation of the present value is shown below:
As we know that
Future value = Present value × (1 + rate of interest)^number of years
$203,000 = Present value × (1 + 0.11)^8
So, the present value is $88,087.08
hence, the present value is $88,087.08
Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
Case 1
Production cost of goods
Work is under way, start 1510
Material direct 9780
Labor Direct 5950
Overhead production 8870
Total cost of production 24600
Total work costs under way 26110
Less: Finishing job in phase 8140
Generated cost of goods 17970
Considering the 47% APR which is compounded daily, after 9 months or 275 days Marina should pay $925.98 to pay off her loan.
