Answer:
$366,667
Explanation:
Average stock can be regarded as stock at the beginning of the period as well as stock towards ending of it
Given:
annual sales =$1,840,000
annual stock turnover =5.4.
average stock can be calculated as
average stock =annual sales/
annual stock turnover
= 1,840,000/ 4.5
= $366,667
Hence the average stock in a department is $366,667
Answer:
The correct answer is introductory.
Explanation:
In short, it is the stage where the conception, definition and experimental period of the product is fixed, studies say that more than 70% fail to launch to the market. It is characterized by:
- Low sales volume
- Great technical, commercial and communication investment.
- Great effort to fine-tune the manufacturing means.
- Difficulties to introduce the product in the market.
- Low saturation of your potential market.
- Few bidders.
- Special dedication of the sales team.
In summary, this phase is characterized by a negative profitability due to the great resources that are necessary to manufacture, launch and refine the product, compared to the sales volume achieved.
Answer:
a. Increase the direct costs of the state's debt.
Explanation:
When a bond's rating is downgraded is a signal to the investors that investing in the bond now is riskier than it was prior to the rating downgrade, hence, a perceived higher risk using the risk/return relationship means that the bond issue would have to offer a higher return to entice the investors to invest in the bonds.
As a result, the higher required rate of return translates into a higher direct cost of the state's debt since their interest rate offered has increased
Answer: My business is a dry cleaners. We clean clothes, household items, press shirts, sterilize and anything else our community may need with regard to cleaning apparel
Explanation:
<span>During the recent financial crisis, many financial managers and corporate officers have been criticized for (c) Large salaries. This criticism is certainly justified given that most executives received exorbitant compensation despite a plunge in the value of their companies. Thus, their salaries are not justifiable as they are not serving the needs of the shareholders whose interest they should serve. </span>
