1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vazorg [7]
3 years ago
10

Why was Texas a source of conflict between the United States and Mexico? The United States did not recognize the independence of

Texas. The United States had seized Texas from Mexico by force. The United States and Mexico disagreed about the US southern border.
History
2 answers:
SCORPION-xisa [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C) The United States and Mexico disagreed on the location of their shared border.

Explanation:

yuradex [85]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: they had done bad things to upset them which led to war

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How does the U.S. Constitution prevents a president from becoming a tryrant
bixtya [17]
Representative democracy and impeachment. I don't know if what you're doing is multiple choice or not.  
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the Declaration of Independence, when should the people have the right to change their government?
lawyer [7]
The correct answer is this one: "B. When the government doesn't protect their natural rights." According to the Declaration of Independence, when the government abuses its power and w<span>hen the government doesn't protect their natural rights</span>, the people should change it or even overthrow it.  As the Declaration says, “it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.” 
7 0
3 years ago
Why did United States business interests favor overseas expansion in the late 1800s?
Sidana [21]
After the Civil War Americans got busy expanding internally. With the frontier to conquer and virtually unlimited resources, they had little reason to look elsewhere. Americans generally had a high level of disdain for Europe, although wealthy Americans were often educated there and respected European cultural achievements in art, music and literature. Americans also felt secure from external threat because of their geographic isolation between two oceans, which gave them a sense of invulnerability. Until very late in the 19th century Americans remained essentially indifferent to foreign policy and world affairs.


What interests America did have overseas were generally focused in the Pacific and the Caribbean, where trade, transportation and communication issues commanded attention. To the extent that Americans wanted to extend their influence overseas they had two primary goals: pursue favorable trade agreements and alignments and foster the spread of Christian and democratic ideals as they understood them. The isolationism that seemed to work for America began to change late in the century for a variety of reasons. First, the industrial revolution had created challenges that required a broad reassessment of economic policies and conduct. The production of greater quantities of goods, the need for additional sources of raw materials and greater markets-in general the expansive nature of capitalism-all called for Americans to begin to look outward.
<span>

America had always been driven by the idea of "manifest destiny," which was at first the idea that the U.S. was to expand over the whole continent of North America, "from the Isthmus of Panama to the Arctic Circle." While Canada and Mexico seemed impervious to further expansion by Americans, at least there had been the rest of the mainland to fill up. With the ending of the frontier and the completion of the settlement of the West the impulse to further expansion spilled out over America's borders.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Who was Carl Vinson?
zloy xaker [14]

Carl Vinson was a United States Representative from Georgia he served more than 50 years and was Democrat he is the longest serving representative from Georgia

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did railroad building lead to increased division between the North and South?
spin [16.1K]
It's C

The north had the money, the people, and the industrial power to branch out the railroad networks. So following markets and money. The north built networks to the west.

The south in contrast was did not have the capacity to construct as much railroads as the north did so therefore there was less western expansion. As well the south had more interests building canals and shipping product of the states to England.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement about the African slave trade is accurate?
    7·2 answers
  • What German act violated the Munich agreement
    14·1 answer
  • What were the main similarities and differences between three colonial regions?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following countries was NOT a member of NATO during the Cold War?
    5·1 answer
  • Three monarchs and their countries from the 1400s-1700s that represented absolute monarchy (autocracy)
    9·1 answer
  • How are Jews and Christians different in regards to messianic thought
    5·1 answer
  • Regular work, no matter the weather, was a blessing to the workers moving from farms to the city because they would work no matt
    10·1 answer
  • Help me with this one
    14·1 answer
  • What is the most important element of freedom to the freedom to the freedmen who gathered for this meeting
    10·1 answer
  • What was the response to FDR's Executive Order 8802?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!