All categories

4 years ago

Will make brainliest If answered correctly

Mathematics

1 answer:

oee [108]4 years ago

4 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Since line is passing through the point (0, 4) & has a slope $\frac{1}{2}. \\\\\therefore (x_1,\:\:y_1) =(0, \:\:4)\:\:\&\:\:m = \frac{1}{2}\\\\$

Equation of line in slope point form is given as:

$y-y_1 =m(x-x_1) \\ \\ \therefore \: y - 4 = \frac{1}{2} (x - 0) \\ \\ \huge \purple{ \boxed{\therefore \: \frac{y - 4 }{x - 0} = \frac{1}{2} }} \\$

Thus, option A is the correct answer.

You might be interested in

Shanghai Company sells glasses, fine china, and everyday dinnerware. It uses activity-based costing to determine the cost of the

Kay [80]

Answer:

glasses 13 times 2 =26 China 13times4=52 dinnerware 13 times 6= 78 fine China 5100 times 4 pounds =20400 pounds times 13 a pound =265200.

7 0

4 years ago

What is true regarding two adjacent arcs created by two intersecting diameters

Alina [70]

Arc with endpoints that are the endpoints of a diameter is called a semicircle and has a measure of 180 degrees. Adjacent arcs are two arcs on the same circle which d<span>o not overlap and s<span>hare a common end point. Hope this answers the question.</span></span>

6 0

4 years ago

Using long division write each rational number as a terminating decimal

S_A_V [24]

99/36= 11/4= 2.3 is my answer

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

During a sale, a store offered 35% discount on a particular couch that was originally priced at $390. After the sale, the discou

stich3 [128]

324 would be your answer to my resortes

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The bad debt ratio for a financial institution is defined to the dollar value of loans defaulted divided by the total dollar val

vlabodo [156]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

From the information given:

Consider X to be the random variable denoting the bad debt ratios for Ohio Bank.

Then, $X \sim N ( \mu, \sigma ^2)$

Thus the null hypothesis and the alternative can be computed as:

Null hypothesis:

$H_o : \mu \leq3.5\%$

Alternative hypothesis

$H_1 : \mu > 3.5\%$

The type I and type II error is as follows:

Type I:

The mean bad debt ratio is > 3.5% when it is not

Type II:

The mean bad debt ratio is ≤ 3.5% when it is not.

The test statistics can be calculated by using the formula:

$t = \dfrac{\overline x - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$

where;

sample size n = 7

mean = 6+8+5+9+7+5+8 = 48

sample mean $\overline x =\dfrac{48}{7}$

$\overline x$ = 6.86

sample standard deviation is :

$s = \sqrt{\dfrac{\sum( x -\overline x)^2}{n-1}}$

$s = \sqrt{\dfrac{( 6 -6.86)^2+( 8-6.86)^2+ ( 5 -6.86)^2 + ...+( 7 -6.86)^2+ ( 5 -6.86)^2+( 8 -6.86)^2 }{7-1}}$

s = 1.573

population mean $\mu = 3.5$

Therefore, the test statistics is :

$t = \dfrac{\overline x - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$

$t = \dfrac{6.86- 3.5}{\dfrac{1.573}{\sqrt{7}}}$

$t = \dfrac{3.36}{\dfrac{1.573}{2.65}}$

$t = \dfrac{3.36\times {2.65}}{{1.573}}$

t = 5.660

At significance level of 0.01

$t_{0.01} = 3.707$

P - value = P(T > 5.66)

P - value = 1 - (T < 5.66)

P - value = 1 - 0.9993

P-value = 0.0007

Therefore, since $t_{0.01} < t$ , we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the claim that the mean bad debt ratio for Ohio banks is higher than the mean for all financial institutions is true.

4 0

4 years ago