Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
It is not because 0.35 is less then 4/9 or 0.44444.
Answers:
- False
- True
- True
- False
- True
- False
===============================================
Explanations:
- If we can write a number as a ratio (or fraction) of two whole numbers, then that number is considered rational. The denominator can never be 0. In the case of 6/4, this is a rational number. Therefore, the statement "6/4 is irrational" is false.
- This is a true statement. We cannot write sqrt(2) as a fraction of two integers. The proof of this is fairly lengthy, but one way is to use a proof by contradiction to show that sqrt(2) = a/b is impossible. Since we cannot make sqrt(2) into a ratio of two integers, we consider it irrational.
- This is a true statement. Any terminating decimal is always rational. In this case, 1.3 = 13/10.
- This is false. Any repeating decimal can be converted to a fraction through a bit of work. It turns out that 17.979797... = 1780/99 which makes the value to be rational.
- Any integer is rational. We can write the integer over 1. So something like -16 is the same as -16/1, showing how it is rational. So that's why this statement is true.
- This statement is false because we found true statements earlier.
Answer:
A. 88
Step-by-step explanation:
A circle is 360 degrees right ? so, 136 cant be right since 136 is almost half of a circle and that angle doesn't look nearly half, 44 and 22 cant be right either since AB is 44 degrees and its growing outwards so it cant be exactly 44 and it cant be less 44 (22)
so your answer will be A. 88
Answer:
(A)
Step-by-step explanation:
Scott cycled for 10 minutes in first week, 15 minutes in second week,20 minutes in third week and 25 minutes in the fourth week which maintains a consistency in the line as there is consistent slope when drawn on a graph.
On, the other hand, harry cycled for 10 minutes in first week, 20 minutes in second, 40 minutes in third and 80 minutes in fourth week in which there is no consistency in the timings according to the weeks. Therefore, only, scott's method is linear as the number of minutes increased by an equal factor every week.
