The process of approving the Constitution is best described as Difficult
<h3>Further explanation
</h3>
A constitution is fundamental principles set according to the nation or a state or an organization is acknowledged to be governed. Ratification is the process of approving the constitution
. It is a principal's approval of an act of its agent that lacked the authority to bind the principal legally and it is where the constitution of a state is taken over the legislature for consideration through specially elected state conventions of the people
The process of ratification initiated by the congress It was happened by putting the constitution to the state legislatures for consideration through the use of the specially elected for the state of convection of the people. The process is involved a five-state convection, which voted to approve the constitution immediately.
The process of approving the constitution is best described as difficult because the ones who came up with the constitution realizes that only in exceptional circumstances should it need to be amended. The constitution is best described as difficult because it will only open the doors for more repression by government
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- Learn more about ratification brainly.com/question/3281819
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Grade: 9
Subject:
Chapter: ratification
Keywords: ratification
Answer: stress management and willingness to travel
Explanation:
Based on the scenario described in the question, Option A and C are both wrong as she doesn't need mechanical knowledge. Mechanical knowledge has to do with one's ability to be able to understand and use tools. She also doesn't need customer service as she isn't attending to customers or anyone.
Since she had to quickly go to Atlanta to put the finishing touches on the project, what she needs is her ability to manage stress and also her willingness to travel.
A. I went to fourth grade however, that was a long time ago
Answer:
Dean probably will be able to get the painting back.
A mutual mistake was made since both parties involved, Dean and Susan, made an important factual error. They both were convinced that the painting was an ordinary copy and that it was worth very little money.
