Answer:
$0
Explanation:
In the case when the depreciation method is changed so it should be treated propectively. The past year depreciation amount remains the same. So the starting year of change having no difference should be produced but the beginning to the closing year of change the deferred tax liability should be recorded the difference occured in the future that lies between the book and tax depreciation
So, it should be zero
<span>Simply put ,this is a Submissive Symmetrical Relationship. This type of relationship happens when there are two partners but neither wants or is able to take complete control or make decisions. In this scenario, that is exactly what Sam and Bette are doing.</span>
Full question:
In some states and localities, scalping is against the law although enforcement is spotty
A. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a weakly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets.
B. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a strongly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets
Answer and Explanation:
A. For the first scenario, a weakly enforced antiscalping law would still allow the resale of tickets as it is not enforced properly. Therefore it's effect on price would remain as though there were no laws restricting scalping( scalping: price increase created by artificial shortage and bulk resale of tickets) . See the attached diagram for the supply and demand curve and price increase as a result of a weak antiscalping law
B. For the second scenario, scalping has no effect on price as antiscalping laws are strong and therefore there is no scalping. Price remains the same and does not change.
In diagram A for first scenario price increases from p1 to p2 and quantity decreases from q1 to q2 to indicate increase in price and quantity decrease for shortage respectively. This shows the effect of scalping on the market with weak antiscalping laws
In diagram B, price and quantity remain the same to show strong antiscalping laws
I think that its either A or D! hope this helps
Answer:
It gives the child more protection so like say we didn't have seat belts then you got into a car accident then you would fly forward and if you had a seatbelt it wouldn't make you fly forward.
Explanation: