Miranda v. Arizona is the U.S. Supreme Court case that condemned using psychological coercion, engaging in trickery or deceit, holding a suspect incommunicado, or making promises that can't be kept.
The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court ruling (1966) ruled that arrested persons have rights to self-discrimination and lawyers under the fifth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution.
The Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects must be informed of their constitutional rights against defense counsel and self-incrimination before cross-examinating police.
the majority opinion by Earl Warren. Article 5 of the Constitutional Amendment requires law enforcement authorities to advise suspects on their right to remain silent during police detention interrogations and to consult lawyers.
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona here: brainly.com/question/1307890
#SPJ4
The act is called emancipation. It is a push to get monetary and social rights, political rights or uniformity, regularly for a particularly disappointed gathering, or all the more by and large, in the exchange of such issues. Notwithstanding, comparative ideas might be alluded to by different terms. For example, in the United States, the Civil Rights Movement finished in the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Salivating at the thought of a hamburger
What do you want to compare exactly?