Following the 9/11 attacks, the United States entered Afghanistan in an attempt to "<span>C. remove the Taliban from power" since this is where most of the Taliban were located. The US invaded Iraq in a failed attempt to find weapons of mass destruction. </span>
Hm, this is not an easy question.
Generally the best way to prevent a nuclear disaster is not to have any weapons, so A would be a good option. But in the modern world, complete destruction of all weapons is not feasible, and people believe that since US and Russia limited their number of weapons, this is no longer such a big concern (option D, which is I think the best. Personally, however I faviour A as a solution to the problem of nuclear weapons).
President Kennedy’s policy of “flexible response” differed from Eisenhower’s New Look Policy in that "<span>(B) it allowed for a response to a wider spectrum of warfare," since the Kennedy Administration believed that the "New Look Policy" was too restricted in its methods of retaliation. </span><span />
Slaves mainly but gold and salt good be included as well
ANSWER
chemistry for explosives
Can you mark me brainliest please?I just need to be ranked virtuosto
