To explain the "no west" comment, in 1812 the American "west" only reached as far as the Mississippi River.
The northern states were heavily involved in international trade, having the ports and ship building yards. The men who sailed on those ships were likewise mostly from the north and were the ones being impressed into the British navy. The agrarian south's interests lay entirely in the production of tobacco, cotton, sugar, sorghum and a few other large cash crops. The commerce was mostly within America and they had little interest in shipping issues.
Answer:
because the Nazis threatened to torture and prosicute them if they did not
Explanation:
When the court renders an opinion, the Chief Justice- when in the majority-decides who writes the courts' opinion. So the answer is B
<em>D. Joint stock colony.</em>
<u>Here I will explain the different colonies and the answer to your question:</u>
<h3>Proprietary Colony</h3>
A proprietary colony is a colony that was given to a certain person or sometimes a group of people under the British crown. These people were called proprietors and they held power over the land in which they owned under the King.
<h3>Charter Colony</h3>
A charter colony is very similar to a proprietary colony, except it was governed by and used a royal charter. This made it so little to no interference from the British crown was present in the colony. Charter colonies were usually run by one person who would be the governor and the individuals of the colony could have a bit more freedom compared to other colonies.
<h3>Royal Colony</h3>
A royal colony is brought directly from the King himself. The King would make the rules overseas and send British government officials to go and run the colony for him. This made it so these colonies were usually used as profit for the British crown and many of the goods found under the Royal colony were sent to England.
<h3>
<em><u>Joint Stock Colony</u></em></h3>
A joint stock colony, which your question is referencing to, was a colony brought directly from investors that were from England. Many companies would sponsor these adventures to current day America, in hopes of getting profit. Individuals would then travel and set up colonies in the New World, where they would then sell items and goods exclusive to that region to the investors who would then make profit.
hope this helps State-based representational conflicts, however, coexisted with regionally-based conflicts. In fact, the struggle to reconcile the place of slavery in the new republic had more influence on the enumeration of federal tax authority in the Constitution than any other issue. The perplexing approach adopted with respect to direct taxation attested to slavery's impact.
Article I, Section 2 provided that "representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons . . . and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other persons." Similarly, Article I, Section 9 stated that "no capitation or other direct tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herinbefore directed to be taken." The insertion of the direct tax clauses was not designed to protect the taxing power of states against the Federal government, or that of richer against poorer states. The delegates sought this compromise, rather, as a means to account for slaves when determining the number of southern congressional representatives. goodluck
