The expected return on the common stock should decrease.
To calculate the new expected return on the common stock, we need to calculate the new value of the common stock and debt. The new value of the common stock is $64 million + $16 million = $80 million. The value of the debt is reduced by $16 million to $20 million.
The new expected return on the common stock is 16.6% * ($80 million/$96 million) = 15.63%.
Therefore, the expected return on the common stock should decrease from 16.6% to 15.63%.
A security that symbolises ownership in a firm is called common stock. Common stock owners choose the board of directors and cast ballots for corporate rules. Long-term rates of return are often higher with this type of stock ownership.
To know more about stock here
brainly.com/question/14040903
#SPJ4
Answer:
$27,500
Explanation:
Revenue from the sale of Product C = $36 × 2500
= $90,000
Cost to produce Product C = $14 × 2500
= $35,000
Revenue from the sale of Product M = $47 × 2500
= $117,500
Differential Total Net Revenue of producing Product M
= $117,500 - $90,000
= $27,500
Answer: Long-term assets are assets with a duration of more than one year. From the list the parties classified as long-term assets are three:
- Land
- Buildings
-Equipment
The rest of the games are classified as:
Accounts receivable (short-term assets)
Notes payable (due in three years) (Long-term liabilities)
Accounts payable (Short-term liabilities)
Retained Revenue (Equity)
Prepaid rental (Short-term assets)
Unearned Renvenue (Short-term liabilities)
Notes payable (due in six months) (Short Term Liabilities)
Answer:
January 1
Cash 614000 Dr
Notes Payable 614000 Cr
Explanation:
The Sheffield Brick Company has borrowed from the Admire county bank which means the note payable is a liability in the books of the Sheffield Brick company. As liability is increased or recorded, it is credited. The amount of liability is $614000 on the day of the issuance of note. Thus, Sheffield will credit Note payable by $614000.
The Sheffield company has received cash by signing note. As cash is an asset and it is increasing, the Sheffield company will debit cash by 614000 against the notes payable.
Answer:
The answer is: B) The statement is false. A decrease in the price of digital cameras would decrease the demand for non-digital cameras, but a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would not cause the demand for non-digital cameras to decrease.
Explanation:
Suppose we are not currently living in 2019, instead we are back 12 years to 2007 (before the iPhone). Back then , digital cameras were still used by common "unprofessional" users. Digital cameras were an improvement compared to non-digital cameras, so the price of non-digital cameras were much lower than their digital counterparts.
If the price of digital cameras decreased, then the price of non-digital cameras would decrease also. For example, if luxury car companies like Mercedes Benz started selling sedan cars for $20,000, Ford and Chevrolet would be forced to lower the price of their cars since they wouldn't be able to compete with MB at the same price.
But a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would never decrease their demand. Something else would have caused that decrease. Probably digital cameras became so cheap that everyone could afford one and since they were so much better than non-digital cameras, people simply stopped buying non-digital cameras.