Answer:
Explanation:
The testimony by the bank employee that the photo accurately portrays the scene of the crime is only required because the photo is only being used as “demonstrative evidence,” and demonstrative evidence only needs to be authenticated to be admissible. Evidence is “authenticated” if there is testimony asserting that the evidence is what the proponent claims it to be.
Number 1 is not necessary because the photo is not being used as original evidence that played an actual role in the robbery itself; for example, a gun used by the robber, which would require a “chain of custody” type of authentication to be admissible.
The reason why some u.s political candidates use those colors is because they are trying to be patriotic to you in your mind
Explanation:
i can't see ur word for it 0_0 where are they?!?!
Explanation:
I mess up everything I try to do. So the don't like my help :(