Answer: B) Evaluation apprehension
Explanation:
Evaluation apprehension is the concept in which it is believed that working on a task with other people can raise concern how will those people think of work may improve or degrade performance.
According to the question, Sarah's situation is describing evaluation apprehension as she has concern what jury will think about her speech which impacts in degradation or enhancement of her speech performance.
Other options are incorrect because self-serving bias, risky shift and altruism is not impacting performance of Sarah.Thus, the correct option is option(B).
Answer: They promised the people military success.
Explanation:
Dictators build their rhetoric on an aggressive policy towards the alleged enemies of their state. Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini used this concept during their reigns. Dictators create militant societies and promise the people that their goals can only be achieved if they are united in war times. In their speeches, they often use the rhetoric of war, and point out to their people that they are in danger from others.
Well if you put the continents together, they kinda fit together like a puzzle piece.
False, Charismatic leaders were not much more conservative than average with respect to risk-taking.
<h3>
Who were Charismatic leaders?</h3>
Adolf Hitler, Barack Obama, and Martin Luther King Jr. are a few examples of charismatic leaders. An organization can gain from charismatic leadership but also face obstacles from it. Having charismatic leaders is important because they motivate and inspire others to perform at their highest level. Positive traits that entice people to naturally submit to a person are embodied by charismatic leadership. A charismatic individual can command a devoted following by exhibiting traits like confidence, conviction, and dominance. In order to inspire others, charismatic leadership combines appeal, interpersonal connection, and persuasiveness.
To learn more about Charismatic leaders, visit:
brainly.com/question/28099781
#SPJ4
To justify what? The question isn't clear.