Answer:
Explanation:I no speak english ;-;-;-
<span>What the cartoons artist was trying to convey about american society b</span><span>y portraying uncle Sam and the statue of liberty talking is that government action is not always in line with liberty, and that sometimes it much be challenged. This is in line with the definition if a subversive given in the question above.</span>
1. Sincere individuals thought that if Native Americans adopted white clothing and ways, they would try first-hand how much better it was and leave behind their native culture, thought as uncivilized by that time. As they would become more assimilated to the American society, the Government wouldn't have to overlook their welfare.
2. The Dawes Act, named after its creator Senator Henry Dawes of Massachusetts, allowed the President to survey Native American tribal land and divide it into allotments to be handed to Native Americans as individual property.
3. Native Americans registered on a tribal "roll" were granted allotments of reservation land. They had to leave behind their culture and adopt the white American one. If they did so, they were granted U.S. citizenship.
4. Excess land after the distributed one to tribal members was sold on the open market. The land allotted to Native American families were a lot of the time desertic, and could not sustain them. The self-sufficient farming techniques were very different from tribal ones. Many of the tribal members didn't want to take up agriculture, and the ones that did couldn't afford tools, seeds and so to get started. Inheritance was also a problem: if there were many inherent, the parcelled allotments wasn't enough to sustain all of them.
5. The government succeeded in erasing a vital part of tribal culture, the common property of the land, setting the foundations for their assimilation and the destruction of their culture. In the long term, these various cultures still exist, despite the government's efforts on the contrary. If the government wanted to protect Native American rights, it failed.
Answer:
The treaty's so-called “war guilt” clause forced Germany and other Central Powers to take all the blame for World War I. ... This meant a loss of territories, reduction in military forces, and reparation payments to Allied powers.
Explanation:
The treaty's so-called “war guilt” clause forced Germany and other Central Powers to take all the blame for World War I. ... This meant a loss of territories, reduction in military forces, and reparation payments to Allied powers.
