Just as countries develop differently, Native tribes developed differently.
Some believe this is a result of geographic and environmental determinism. That is, that the geography that you settle in influences how you develop as a civilization. As a result, the Wabanki Confederacy in New England with access to rich forests and coastlines would develop differently and tell different stories than the Lakota Sioux in the Dakotas with access to buffalo and wide open plains.
Yes, you can build a society without social hierarchy. Look back at villages with no mayor, or anyone really as the ‘leader’. Everyone was at everyone’s level, just trying to survive. But when people start to think they are better then everyone else, or they start to horde supplies for just themselves, that is when a social hierarchy starts to occur. So as long as that does not happen, you can create a society without a social hierarchy.
No, you can not build a society without a social hierarchy. A social hierarchy is the bones of society. Monarchy’s, Capitalism, Democracy, etc. they all have a social hierarchy in them. There is always the top dog, and there is always the smaller one. Think of all of the great empires and nations. England, the was a king/queen. Rome, it had emperors, and was also a republic. China, had emperors as well.
(Sorry but you are probably gonna have to fine tune the paragraphs. I made it so you can go either way, yes or no.)
Answer:
Millenarianism
Explanation:
Millenarianism is the relief by a religious, social, or political group or movement in a coming fundamental transformation of society.
Answer:
Fairly sure it's the first one.