Answer:
The power the government has over the military and other armed forces is extense. The government could use the military to stop a social movement or a strike. In terms of sheer ability, the government can order the military to act, and be held responsible for the consequences. However, under the Rule of Law, the government does not have the political authority to do so. As it cannot act against the rights and liberties of people. The Rule of Law prevents precisely that: an arbitrary action from the government against its own citizens. The moment a government uses its power arbitrarily and without political authority, the Rule of Law is broken.
Explanation:
Because they lack the viciousness of normal revolutions. There are claims that they do not change all that much even though ti appears so because only in violent and ferocious revolutions can the institutions of power truly be changed, like what was seen in Russia during the Communist revolution.
I think its <span>40a ^9 b^6</span>
<span>The New England colonies were able to make a lot of buildings because of this advantage.</span>
Nixon was a "crook" and clinton cheated on his wife, not sure about jonhson
