he doctrine or belief that there is only one God. Belief in one god who requires people to be just and kind
D. William the Conqueror defeated King Harold and established Norman rule over England.
1066 is when William the Conqueror (the french duke of Normandy) first began the Norman conquest of England. It was at the Battle of Hastings that he defeated The Anglo-Saxon King Harold II. William the Conqueror would then be the first Norman King of England.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
they believed in many gods
Answer:
The people of the area had pre-existing Socialist ideas.
Explanation:
The Socialist Party of Oklahoma was centered in the former Indian Territory because its leaders considered that its socialist ideas, which included (and still include today) concepts such as collective ownership of land, centralized planning of the economy, equality absolute between individuals, etc., were similar to the concepts of property that were established in the laws of the Native Americans. In this way, by establishing their centers in the native territories, the leaders of the Oklahoma Socialist Party believed that there they would have high rates of support, which would allow them little by little to grow in national politics.
Answer:
The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.
According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.
The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.
The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time
Explanation:
