Which statement best describes the period of Reconstruction and how it relates to today's events

History

1 answer:

PSYCHO15rus [73]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Reconstruction, in U.S. history, the period (1865–77) that followed the American Civil War and during which attempts were made to redress the inequities of slavery and its political, social, and economic legacy and to solve the problems arising from the readmission to the Union of the 11 states that had seceded at or before the outbreak of war. Long portrayed by many historians as a time when vindictive Radical Republicans fastened Black supremacy upon the defeated Confederacy, Reconstruction has since the late 20th century been viewed more sympathetically as a laudable experiment in interracial democracy. Reconstruction witnessed far-reaching changes in America’s political life. At the national level, new laws and constitutional amendments permanently altered the federal system and the definition of American citizenship. In the South, a politically mobilized Black community joined with white allies to bring the Republican Party to power, and with it a redefinition of the responsibilities of government.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Is a raptor dinosaur a prokaryote or eukaryote?

balandron [24]

Answer: Prokaryote

Explanation: Give me the brainiest

4 0

3 years ago

how could it be a problem if the president could fire justices of the supreme court if he didnt like the ruling they made

goblinko [34]

It would violate the constitution i believe. The President shouldn't have that much power. Our government was designed to have that many branches to make sure things went slow, so we could protest any new rules. If the president managed to fire the Supreme Court, a crucible part of our government would be gone!

3 0

3 years ago

What came first columbus discovering america or the magna carta

const2013 [10]

The Magna Carta was first in 1251. Columbus discovered america in 1492.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

2. What were some of the key ideas of The Prince, Utopia, and Praise of Folly? How were these writings the same? How were they d

pickupchik [31]

<span>In the prince of folly,Desiderius Erasmus examined his contemporary world of the Medieval ages and put forth in satire,using a narrator and main character personified as folly,its deep rooted ignorance and stubborness for all to see,to reveal what the world lacked.Thomas Mores utopia ,with similar intentions,practically illustrates a more direct solution to the times with his depictions of the manners and ways of distant people of a place known as utopia.</span>

8 0

3 years ago

Wyzanski argues the principle against ex post facto laws is essential for Rule Of Law (otherwise, it merely becomes Rule of Man)

diamong [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10. Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.

The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made". It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.

7 0

3 years ago