Answer:
Prisoner reentry is a program made of offenders (incarcerated individual) whereby they are assisted with a successful transition to their community after they are released. The significance of this is that, it encourages the integration of the offender into the socety inorder to contribute in the growth of the community rather than going back to the life of crime.
On the otherhand, it helps the society towards drastic reduction of the number of people incarcerated in prisons thereby promoting the rehabilitation and bahavioural corrections for which the prison is meant for.
<em>The prisoner reentry differs from parole in that, in reentry, the offender is truely free to integerate into the society whereas in parole, the offender has a stipulated time frame upon which his good behaviour while being integerated in the society is mandatory. If he goes contrary against the expected behaviour, he would be thrown into prison to continue his sentences.</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
Answer:
The argument seems logical but...
Explanation:
In population there is not much difference between New Jersey (9 million) and Georgia (10 million) but I guess in average income there is, and quite a big one too.
We also have to take into account that a state that legalizes sports betting will attract many people in the beginning (because of the novelty) and, more to the point, that probably a lot of these people making sports bets are not residents of New Jersey.
A more ethical argument would be to prove that legalizing sports bets is indeed an effective way to stop the ilegal sports betting.
Their spirits where committed to what they believed in, and their attitude was positive and they didn't question there leaders.
Answer:
Climate change can disrupt food availability, reduce access to food, and affect food quality. For example, projected increases in temperatures, changes in precipitation patterns, changes in extreme weather events, and reductions in water availability may all result in reduced agricultural productivity.
Explanation:
google says so
Answer:
The Camps were a difficult place to live because the Japanese Americans who lived there had to endure bad food, inadequate medical care, and poorly equipped schools.
People who lived in the camps had to share bathroom and laundry facilities, and hot water was usually limited. The camps were surrounded by barbed wire and guards who were supposed to shoot those who tried to escape.
To summarize, the camps were not overly harsh or terrible, but it was unfair to force Japanese Americans to live in them when they had done nothing wrong, and when the living conditions at the camp were inadequate.
Please give me brainliest if I helped!
