Answer:
place theory is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Jason studies Spanish for three years, and then switches to Pashto. When asked to remember Spanish vocabulary he can’t, instead he can only remember Pashto vocabulary. This is an example of <u>retroactive </u>interference.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
Retro active interference means that the individual can not remember the older information that he had learnt because the recent information is acting as an obstacle in recalling the older information.
The new information is a problem which does not let the old information to be recalled. That is why Jason can not recall Spanish which he had learnt three years ago and only remembers Pashto which he had learnt recently. Pashto is acting as an obstacle in recalling the Spanish language.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Pollack and Pickett's found from their experiment on understanding speech that only 50% of the words spoken by their own voices could be identified by the participants.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The experiment carried out by Pollack and Pickett was intended at determining whether or not people recognize and understand the words and syllables spoken by their own selves when the words are presented to them separately one word at a time.
- The experiment was inspired by the fact that humans often perceive their own voice in a different way than how it actually is.
Answer:
One problem regarding inconsistency in moral reasoning is that it affects the harmony between our actions and inner values.
Explanation:
Moral Reasoning refers to the way in which a person identifies what is right and wrong. He uses <u>logic</u> in order to deal with this. This guides the principles that a person follows in life. This can be affected by several factors such as: <em>intelligence, age, emotion, how the child was brought up, to name a few.</em>
<u>Consistency in moral reasoning means that a person's actions and inner values should be "consistent" or in harmony with each other.</u> For example, if a person knows that throwing garbage along the river is bad, then he doesn't do that. He also acts as an advocate by telling people not to do it as well.
Once inconsistency occurs in moral reasoning, it causes a disharmony between the actions and inner values. It makes the person confused on what to do in his life. It becomes harder for him to follow the right path.
