1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
morpeh [17]
3 years ago
14

Which statement is true? Group of answer choices The racial origin of hair can always be identified. Hair can be individualized

through its trace elemental composition. Hair is routinely examined to determine sex. Two hairs from the same head may not have the same morphological characteristics.
Social Studies
2 answers:
Bingel [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Two hairs from the same head may not have the same morphological characteristics.

Explanation:

The medulla is the hair core that is not always present. ... Hair can best be characterized as originating from an animal be examining..... Both the medulla and cuticle. T/F: Two hairs from the same head may not have the same morphological characteristics.

Nutka1998 [239]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Two hairs from the same head may not have the same morphological characteristics.

You might be interested in
Jason made index cards on a textbook chapter and always studied them in the same order. During the exam, he was able to recall t
Brums [2.3K]

Answer:a) Regency effec b) Primary effect

Explanation:The Primacy/Recency Effect refers to the fact that one is able to remember the first information or what they hear first or what they encounter at the begining (primacy ) and the last information at the end(Recency) better than they remember the information found in the middle .

Primacy is likely caused by the fact that one has plenty of time to recall this first presented Information because it doesn't compete with other information as it is the first encounter. Middle information is hard to recall because there is usually a lot of information to recall in the middle whilst the last information is usually short as does the first information.

7 0
3 years ago
The peer review process, in which scientists submit write-ups of their ideas and experiments to a set of colleagues who judge ho
wariber [46]

Option C

The peer review process, in which scientists submit write-ups of their ideas and experiments to a set of colleagues who judge how good the ideas are before the ideas can be published, is: A useful and important, even if imperfect, mechanism of quality-control for the scientific literature

<u>Explanation:</u>

The peer-review practice endures to approve scholarly work, accommodates to enhance the worth of proclaimed research, and builds networking circumstances in research areas. Notwithstanding critiques, peer review is yet the unique internationally affirmed system for research validation.

Peer review guarantees that documents undergo a fair evaluation and skillful opinion, enabling scholars to develop their script and therefore high-quality experimental interpretation and articles to be proclaimed. It also encourages the browsers to believe the scientific uprightness of the report and to present notified declarations where peer reviewer comments are ready.

3 0
3 years ago
Why was The Preamble important in 1787 and still is today?
Brut [27]
The Preamble is important in 1787 and it still is today because the Preamble states the rights and freedoms that all citizens have in the United States.
8 0
3 years ago
How did southern whites regain political power during reconstruction
KiRa [710]

Reconstruction continued until 1877 when President Rutherford Hayes was elected. His presidency allowed the South to regain political power and indirectly facilitated practices that prevented African-Americans and other minorities from enjoying the rights granted by the 13th Amendment

6 0
4 years ago
The protesters are citizens, and they're complaining about a new law that was just passed. What should they do if they want to c
vivado [14]

Answer:

Use the court system

Explanation:

In order to challenge a new law as a citizen you need to use the court system.   The citizen in question would need to file a class action lawsuit in court seeking to declare the federal law unconstitutional. This is then reviewed and decided by the courts, where the Supreme Court ultimately has the final verdict on this issue.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • "Development of society is universal process". Explain
    10·1 answer
  • What is the name given to much of Australia's interior? the Everglades
    15·2 answers
  • How can sport either support or impede nation building?
    9·1 answer
  • When did most states begin banning abortion?
    7·1 answer
  • Ne of the most difficult problems for any teacher is a child who consistently disrupts class. researchers have shown that giving
    10·1 answer
  • What is the size and shape of brazil.
    15·1 answer
  • What are the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress
    13·1 answer
  • Why do you think people believe in fake news ​
    8·1 answer
  • HELP PLZZZZ
    7·2 answers
  • Taxing less and government spending more to help the economy grow is referred to as
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!