He thought that the act should not exist because it restricts the power of unions and the people's right to unionize. He went as far as to call it a "slave-labor bill", when he vetoed it in 1947. He also argued that it was against building a democratic society and that the bill was unconstitutional because it limited free speech.
It was probably something to do with there rival
I would go with answer
B: They both relied on each other for goods and services.
