Answer: King David broke the following commandment: "Thou shalt not commit adultery" (Exodus 20:14). Despite knowing she was a married woman, David slept with Bathsheba, the wife of Uriah. She got pregnant; David was afraid that his sin would be known. While Uriah was fighting in a war, the king ordered his top commander to put him in the frontline so that he might be killed and the king would take his wife. Dominated by lust, David falls into immoral behavior and breaks the laws of Yahweh.
Explanation:
Answer:
<u>President Lincoln freed slaves, and he was apart of the Republican party. Slaves were freed during the civil war and the North/Union was the side that wanted to free them.</u>
Explanation: "That day—January 1, 1863—President Lincoln formally issued the Emancipation Proclamation, calling on the Union army to liberate all enslaved people in states still in rebellion as “an act of justice, warranted by the Constitution, upon military necessity.” These three million enslaved people were declared to be “then, thenceforward, and forever free.” The proclamation exempted the border states that remained in the Union and all or parts of three Confederate states controlled by the Union army." "The Emancipation Proclamation transformed the Civil War from a war against secession into a war for “a new birth of freedom,” as Lincoln stated in his Gettysburg Address in 1863." The reality is that the North's opposition to slavery was based on political and anti-south sentiment, economic factors, racism, and the creation of a new American ideology. While the South was dependent on slavery and wanted to keep enslaved people. Hope this helps.
Mr. Justice Jackson, dissenting. . . .
Much is said of the danger to liberty from the Army program for deporting and detaining these citizens of Japanese extraction. But a judicial construction of the due process clause that will sustain this order is a far more subtle blow to liberty than the promulgation of the order itself. A military order, however unconstitutional, is not apt to last longer than the military emergency. Even during that period a succeeding commander may revoke it all. But once a judicial opinion rationalizes such an order to show that it conforms to the Constitution, or rather rationalizes the Constitution to show that the Constitution sanctions such an order, the Court for all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination in criminal procedure and of transplanting American citizens. . . . A military commander may overstep the bounds of constitutionality, and it is an incident. But if we review and approve, that passing incident becomes the doctrine of the Constitution. There it has a generative power of its own, and all that it creates will be in its own image. Nothing better illustrates this danger than does the Court’s opinion in this case. . . .
yes i copy and pasted but this is your answer
This painting represented the peasant/ lowest class of Ancient Egypt.
Some jobs these people had was farming, raising cattle, and helping to build monuments for the king.
Hope this helped!
~Cheers.
