Answer:
The bourgeoisie exploited the proletarians
Explanation:
The bourgeoisie largely reaped the benefits of the proletarians work. This inspired many people like Lenin to revolt and Mao Zedong to revolt against the bourgeoisie, and promised better working conditions overall to the proletariat.
History has shown us that Sun Yat-Sen and Yuan Shigai <u>did </u><u>not share </u><u>the same </u><u>motives </u><u>for </u><u>supporting </u><u>the provisional </u><u>government</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Sun Yat-Sen and Yuan Shigai in 1911</h3>
- Both men were very influential in calls for the end of the Qing dynasty.
- Sun Yat-Sen was a strong believer in the need for China to modernize and change its governance in other to develop.
While Sun Yat-Sen had better motives for China in mind, Yuan Shigai did not and when he took over, he became increasingly authoritarian and even tried to proclaim himself emperor.
In conclusion, they did not have the same motives.
Find out more on Sun Yat-Sen at brainly.com/question/780808.
Answer:
The Confeds won and Union lost.
Explanation:
Answer:
Monopoly market
Explanation:
In a monopoly market there are privately owned markets as well as production
It helped the Bolshevik government survive the problems of 1921 – there were no new revolts, and the government was able to establish itself securely in power.
HOPE IT HELPS YOU '_'
