Answer:Cyandie turns a deep blue when certain chemicals are added
Explanation:
Cyanide seizes every form of oxygen from the body, leading to the death of cells in the human body, as cells need oxygen to be functional, liquid forms of cyanide can be absorbed through the skin, and when they do, they interfere with cellular respiration, making it difficult for the body tissues to use oxygen. Cyanide is more harmful to the heart and brain, which are major users of oxygen in body organs.
Your answer is D Chickamauga because it was the second most bloodiest battle with almost 34,000 dead its lasted 3 years before ending and it was known as the second most bloodiest battle in the Civil War also its not A because Anderson was naught a bloody battle it also wasn't B because Atlanta it was a big battle but its not a bloody battle and when it came down to rather C, or D I choose D because C was a big battle but it wasn't so much as bloody its more like long.
Your answer is D.
The view of CCIRs has expanded due to the dynamic environment, is the impact has the complex environment characterized by disaster relief efforts.
<h3>What is CCIRs?</h3>
Commander's critical information requirements assist the commander in taking prompt actions that result in favorable outcomes. The CCIR, which establishes the objectives for reconnaissance, directs the commander's reconnaissance direction.
Doctrine divides CCIRs into two categories: priority intelligence needs, which are focused on the enemy and environment, and friendly force information requirements, which are focused on friendly troops and supporting assets.
Thus, The view of CCIRs has expanded due to the dynamic environment.
For more details about CCIRs, click here:
brainly.com/question/9079611
#SPJ4
When you here that term is usually refers WWII and the Nazi's. Concentration camps were basically huge "prisons" or barracks where the Nazi regime placed people deemed undesirable to the Aryan race. It was were a place where these people were labeled by numbers and all there possessions were taken away. There was very little food, and poor sanitary conditions. 11 million people were killed in these camps. 6 million Jews were the greatest number killed. The other 5 million consisted of other types of people that the Nazi's considered undesirable- such as Roma Gypsies, persons with disabilities, homosexuals.
Of course, the range of arguments supporting compulsory voting is matched by a plethora of reasons why the U.S. should keep voting voluntary.
One of the major arguments given by those against compulsory voting is that it leads to a greater number of uninformed voters, noting that those who choose not vote are generally less educated on political issues than those who choose to vote. Critics argue that the resulting surplus of politically ignorant voters has three main negative consequences:
Misleading uninformed voters. It is often asserted that uninformed voters are more susceptible to the influence of money and spending on television ads. A short advertisement is likely to have a greater influence on an uninformed voter than one who already has strong views. This encourages the use of sensational and misleading advertising and may have a negative effect on campaigning techniques. While politicians no longer need to try to convince citizens to go out and vote, they still need to find ways to maximize their vote among less informed voters. Australian political scientist, Haydon Manning notes that compulsory voting often “require[s] banal sloganeering and crass misleading negative advertising.”
Ignoring the wishes of most voters. Since uninformed voters are more easily persuaded, some politicians may choose to focus on marginal voters and ignore their main base of support. Even if compulsory voting leads to less polarization, it may not result in better policy outcomes because complicated and nuanced legislation may be perceived negatively by swing voters.
Dampening the voice of the majority. An additional concern under a compulsory system is that people who are uninformed (or simply do not care about the outcome of an election) may end up voting randomly. The impact of ‘random’ votes ends up being particularly detrimental because it fails to increase civic engagement and may skew election results.
Compulsory voting presents some ethical challenges. Many people argue that it infringes upon individual liberty by denying people the ability to choose not to vote. While it is true that ballots may include a “none of the above” option (though, in practice, typically do not), the act of voting itself may be seen as “endorsing” the current politicians and political system, an endorsement that some citizens may not want to make.
While it seems pretty unlikely right now that compulsory voting will be adopted in the United States, at least on a federal level, it is a policy to keep in mind as America continues striving towards a better democracy.
Explanation:
