Answer:
a member of precariat.
Explanation:
A precariat is a form of social class that includes a person who suffers from precarity. Precarity is the condition in which a person suffers from a state of insecure income and employment. Thus, the term 'precariat' is used to define people working-class people of a social group. People who belong to precariat group do not have employment rights also and suffers a difficult life because of less or no job security.
<u>In the given case, Janet, who works multiple part-time jobs with no non-wage benefits can be classified as a member of precariat. As stated above, a precariat do not have a job security with no employment or non-wages benefits; Janet fits in this classification</u>.
So, the correct answer is a member of precariat.
Answer:
FDR had been stirring up conflicts in Europe since around 1935 in the hopes of getting the United States involved in a war to create jobs after his New Deal programs failed.
The war in Europe didn't involve United States' interests, and so Congress wouldn't give FDR the green light.
To force their hand, he arranged for oil embargoes around the Pacific and then lured Japan to America with promises of much-needed oil.
First, however, they were required to purchases licenses to buy the oil and then Roosevelt reneged on selling them at the last minute. This infuriated the Japanese, provoking them into attacking Pearl Harbor.
In doing this, FDR's provocation of Japan to attack the US was an act of treason.
Explanation:
The correct answer is aversion therapy.
Aversion therapy refers to a form of therapy that involves combining an aversive stimulus with a behavior so that the behavior in question can eventually be extinguished. In Marybeth's case, by associating suicidal thoughts with the aversive smell of ammonia, her therapist is aiming to extinguish Marybeth's suicidal thoughts.
I researched this topic, and found that the first American combat troops arrived in Vietnam on <span>March 8, 1965, so your answer would be B!
Hope this helps, and happy studying!
~Mistermistyeyed.</span>
Culture influences the daily state of society and its direction of development, while politics determines the nature and form of culture and has the function of transforming it. Therefore, politics has a decisive role in deciding which direction the culture is going to develop. Culture is the basis for shaping social normalcy and development. Politics only fundamentally changes this foundation, while culture reflects its reality and internality. Has nurtured social characters, such as nationality, people's general personality characteristics and customs and habits. However, culture and politics are influencing and interacting with each other. While politics determines culture, culture also influences politics in a subtle manner.
The reason why culture affects a society is that culture not only shapes the human nature of people in the society, but also casts people’s world outlook, outlook on life, and values; social customs and ethical morality are gradually formed in the process of cultural influence. Fixed down. In a certain sense, the sociality of a society is a concentrated expression of the social culture. Harrison believes: "Culture is the values, beliefs, and concepts shared by members of a society. These values, beliefs, and attitudes are mainly through the environment, religion, and the adoption of child-rearing practices, religious practices, education systems, media, and The historical accidental factors that were passed down from their peers were formed." The impact of culture on society is in all aspects, from the formulation and implementation of policies and laws, the formation of social ideologies and customs, and the status of interpersonal relationships, while the smaller ones involve the shaping of individual personalities and the establishment of ideological concepts. Behavioral performance and so on. In general, culture will generally affect the status, direction, and speed of a society's activities. When culture succeeds in shaping the customs of a society, then the customs and habits of this society will edify and influence people's ideas, behaviors, and personalities; therefore, there will be such things as Tocqueville. This phenomenon was said to have occurred.
The impact of culture on the path of social evolution is not only crucial to achieving the goal of reducing poverty and injustice throughout the world, it is also a key factor in foreign policy.
