All categories

3 years ago

30/49(-63/40) please solve

Mathematics

2 answers:

Allisa [31]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

-27/28

hope this helps :D have a good day

kati45 [8]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Your answer is -27/28

You might be interested in

Solve the equation below

Agata [3.3K]

Set up the equation:

4(8.75x-2)=97
35x-8 =97
35x =97+8
35x =105
x. =3

The value of x is 3.

7 0

2 years ago

Find the area of square if the length of its diagonal is 18 cm

NikAS [45]

Answer:

324

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

If you take -3/10 of a number and add 1, you get 10. Write an equation to represent the situation. What is the original number?

Basile [38]

Equation - x = -3/10 + (10－1）

The original number is 9.3 because
x = -3/10 + (10－1）
x = -3/10 + 9
x = 9.3

4 0

3 years ago

Calculus piecewise function.

Kipish [7]

Part A

The notation $\lim_{x \to 2^{+}}f(x)$ means that we're approaching x = 2 from the right hand side (aka positive side). This is known as a right hand limit.

So we could start at say x = 2.5 and get closer to 2 by getting to x = 2.4 then to x = 2.3 then 2.2, 2.1, 2.01, 2.001, etc

We don't actually arrive at x = 2 itself. We simply move closer and closer.

Since we're on the positive or right hand side of 2, this means we go with the rule involving x > 2

Therefore f(x) = (x/2) + 1

Plug in x = 2 to find that...

f(x) = (x/2) + 1

f(2) = (2/2) + 1

f(2) = 2

This shows $\lim_{x \to 2^{+}}f(x) = 2$

Then for the left hand limit $\lim_{x \to 2^{-}}f(x)$ , we'll involve x < 2 and we go for the first piece. So,

f(x) = 3-x

f(2) = 3-2

f(2) = 1

Therefore, $\lim_{x \to 2^{-}}f(x) = 1$

===============================================================

Part B

Because $\lim_{x \to 2^{+}}f(x) \ne \lim_{x \to 2^{-}}f(x)$ this means that the limit $\lim_{x \to 2}f(x)$ does not exist.

If you are a visual learner, check out the graph below of the piecewise function. Notice the gap or disconnect at x = 2. This can be thought of as two roads that are disconnected. There's no way for a car to go from one road to the other. Because of this disconnect, the limit doesn't exist at x = 2.

===============================================================

Part C

You'll follow the same type of steps shown in part A.

However, keep in mind that x = 4 is above x = 2, so we'll deal with x > 2 only.

So you'd only involve the second piece f(x) = (x/2) + 1

You should find that f(4) = 3, and that both left and right hand limits equal this value. The left and right hand limits approach the same y value. The limit does exist here. There are no gaps to worry about when x = 4.

===============================================================

Part D

As mentioned earlier, since $\lim_{x \to 4^{+}}f(x) = \lim_{x \to 4^{-}}f(x) = 3$ , this means the limit $\lim_{x \to 4}f(x)$ does exist and it's equal to 3.