The land was purchased for $300,000.00; however, after back taxes the total was $308,500.00.
The cost of demolishing an existing building, clearing the land and paving the parking lot had a grand total of $42,100.00.
<u>Answer:</u> The cost of land is $308,500 and the cost of land improvements is $42,100.
Answer:
option C is correct CPI in Kansas City is 125 and in Dallas is 150.
Explanation:
given data
Kansas City pays = $50,000
Dallas that pays = $60,000
solution
we know that CPI base year is always = 100
first we get here real salary value in Kansas City that is express as
Real Value = Salary in Kansas City × (CPI base year ÷ CPI current year) ..........1
put her value we get
Real Value = $50,000 × data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23390/233903042ba4d3ebcd6d287b32968c933757bc36" alt="\frac{100}{125}"
Real Value = $40000
and now we get here real salary value in Dallas that is express as
Real Value = Salary in Dallas City × (CPI base year ÷ CPI current year) ..........2
put her value we get
Real Value = $60,000 × data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c7d7/3c7d762aceabfcb4aea49fd6afaff885704a54fd" alt="\frac{100}{150}"
Real Value = $40000
so now we can see that both value is same in both city with CPI Kansas City = 125 and CPI Dallas = 150
so here correct option is c. 125 in Kansas City and 150 in Dallas
Answer:
We fix it by committing to the customer and setting up an environment to support it.
Answer:
mortgage account
For me:
I like that among us account perfect
Answer:
1. buy more salads and fewer sandwiches.
Explanation:
As we know that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df742/df742f47ce52cf0151ee81ffa23cc6473cb021ae" alt="\textup{MU}_{S}=\textup{Marginal utility of Sadwitches}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f8f2/5f8f2e5a1d75a2082d169ba8bbe8b4a744eaafb0" alt="\textup{MU}_{SA}=\textup{Marginal utility of Salad}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b6b/11b6b9f3c3b74e1a1283697f052ef9a3ebad6c72" alt="\textup{P}_{S}=\textup{Price of Sanswithches}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe611/fe61178f4974c886708b0a99e81f240485a13511" alt="\textup{P}_{SA}=\textup{Price of Salads}"
Therefore
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4bc5/a4bc5f00bfd497bc96ef1eaee7610e3c0dd782ab" alt="\frac{MU_{S}}{MU_{SA}}=\frac{P_{S}}{P_{SA}}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb24b/fb24bb60fc7a11259787a22344fb07d80969d832" alt="\frac{MU_{S}}{MU_{SA}}=\frac{\$40}{\$40}=1"
Now the price ratio is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e423/2e4235ec4557794375a298c17fecd20411eba52a" alt="\frac{P_{S}}{P_{SA}}=\frac{\$3}{\$2}=1.5"
It is probable if you rising marginal utility numbering and reduce denominator marginal utility. If you reduce their intake, the MU of a food item will raise. Such decrease in the composition would make the quantity of the food element scarce. And its usefulness goes up. The Numerator here is sandwich MU. And to increase their marginal utility, you can reduce sandwich consumption.
Salad should need just the reverse. You raise salad intake so the MU reduces. Therefore you have to eat more salads and less chicken sandwiches to maximise the utility. So, salad is replaced by sandwiches for chicken.