It would be "Nut: ensured good harvests," that is not correctly matched with his or her role, since in fact Nut was the goddess of the sky in the Egyptian culture.
<span> The ancient Egyptians were much more advanced than other civilizations in their era. One of their amazing achievements was inventing the calendar. They invented the calendar so they could know at what time of the year the Nile River would flood. Here is a picture of their calendar compared to ours. </span>
"<span>a. It was the middle leg of a three-legged journey, a leg in which slaves were transported from Africa to the Americas" would best describe the "Middle Passage" which was extremely brutal. Many slaves died en route. </span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
