Economic sanctions and military force
As a writer for an abolitionist newspaper, you would write a heated opinion article to criticize the newly enacted Fugitive Slave law.
<h3>What did Abolitionists think of the Fugitive Slave Law?</h3>
I can't write the opinion article for you but I can give you pointers.
Abolitionists in the North were appalled and very angry when they heard that the Fugitive Slave Law had been passed because they believed that it would make it much harder to get people out of slavery.
They also believed that it infringed upon the rights of a State to be a free state that does not permit slavery and lastly, it meant that African Americans who were free in the North could now be targeted by slave hunters which was grossly unfair.
Write these reasons for being against the Fugitive Slave Law in the opinion article and then conclude by calling on the Northern states to resist this law.
Find out more on the Fugitive Slave law at brainly.com/question/542501
#SPJ1
50 years is a long time but not long enough for the preconquest Aztec to forget their way of living before the Spanish came. The compromise lies in how easy it is to get historical information from the Aztec since some of them will have already learned Spanish very well and between how accurate these historical accounts are since little details about the preconquest Aztec society can be forgotten in 50 years.
From his recollections, McCoy remembers the years after the Civil War, describing how there <em>weren't many differences between</em> his life as a freedman and a slave. Even though slavery was abolished, it is observable in the interview that there were few <em>guarantees to exercise liberty</em>, hence being uneducated, dependence on former slavemasters and disinterest on political issues were some of the aspects that led McCoy to conclude that changes weren't that visible.
