The answer is B, and here's why. Set up a table for "there" and "back" and use the distance = rate * time formula, like this:
d r t
there d 450 t
back d 400 1-t
Let me explain this table to you. The distance is d, we don't know what it is, that's what we are actually looking for. We only know that if we go somewhere from point A to point B, then back again to point A, the distance there is the same as the distance back. Hence, the d in both spaces. There he flew 450 mph, back he flew 400 mph. If the total distance was 1 hour, he flew an unknown time there and one hour minus that unknown time back. For example, if he flew for 20 minutes there, one hour minus 20 minutes means that he flew 60 minutes - 20 minutes = 40 minutes back. See? Now, because the distance there = the distance back, we can set the rt in both equal to each other. If d = rt there and d = rt back and the d's are the same, then we can set the rt's equal to each other. 450t = 400(1-t) and
450t = 400 - 400t and 850t = 400. Solve for t to get t = .47058. Now, t is time, not the distance and we are looking for distance. So multiply that t value by the rate (cuz d = r*t) to get that the distance one way is
d = 450(.470580 and d = 211. 76 or, rounded like you need, 212.
Answer:
A. 16
Step-by-step explanation:
We can use a ratio to solve
4 bracelets x bracelets
----------------- = -------------
12 minutes 48 minutes
Using cross products
4 * 48 = 12x
192 = 12x
Divide by 12 on each side
192/12 =12x/12
16 =x
Answer:
Below is the answer in the simplest form possible: 0. 21 repeating as a fraction = 7/33 Decimal Repeating as a Fraction Calculator
Answer: legislative risk
Step-by-step explanation:
Legislative risk refers to a form of risk whereby there's likelihood of a business making a loss on an investment due to governmental action.
Legislative risk implies an amendment or an abolition of laws which has a direct impact on investments. Regarding the question, the introduction of the new tax laws and fiscal policies is a legislative risk.
Answer:
good question.... maybe by the way a person acts
Step-by-step explanation:
